Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

How terrifying was Joseph Stalin ?

Antichrist

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2018
Messages
306
Was Joseph Stalin a real beast or he was just a puppet of Jews like many others were in history? And how good was he intellectually and spiritually ? Can we compare him with Hitler in these terms? Does the enemy have the person of Stalin's level today?

Hail Satan!
 
I don’t remember which sermon it was, but it was stated that Stalin did make use of the occult. He was in league with the Rothschilds, although this was indirectly and not known to the public at the time. He didn’t have the power that the Rothschilds had, but I don’t really think he was just a puppet, either.
 
Comparing him with Adolf Hitler is like comparing a dung beetle to an eagle.

In terms of intelligence he was probably lesser than even Putin is today. The reason he had so much control and power is because the nation has already succumbed to communism before he took power.

Stalin's main danger was the iron fist with which he ruled. Uncompromising and one of complete control. He was a tyrant that mostly ruled through domination rather than great intellect or scheming.

People didn't really dare to go up against him, because he was completely uncompromising and unforgiving. He was also ruthless and anyone who didn't obey would be dealt with.

Someone good at keeping control after it was established. I do not think he was only a figurehead, but certainly other jews held a lot more control behind the scenes and would have dictated to him what sort of actions to take to keep the regime on the track they desired.

During those times the enemy aliens were in close contact with the communist leadership, and especially the rabbi's behind the scenes to dictate to them how to proceed with the war plan and how to maintain the control, which is a significant part of the reason why ww2 went the way it did.

Most of the plans and dictates likely came from them rather than any jews or others in positions of leadership.

It is not the tyrant that is dangerous, but the one who manages to make a nation submit to tyranny. In that sense, Lenin was much more troublesome than Stalin was, as he lead the early Bolshevik revolution and trounced the tsardom to establish the communist regime.

As for the Jews having any characters like that around today, there are a bunch of tyrant individuals not too different from them in positions of power today, ruling either through wealth or control of information.

Billy gates is an example of someone in a position of power that abuses this to the maximum these days, but he is not particularly intelligent or capable himself.

Not exactly a puppet as he does his own things sometimes, but certainly someone who is used by the jews and their alien backing to further their agenda.

Being a tyrant becomes exponentially easier if one is enabled by a great many people and controls an absurd amount of wealth and resources.

The main problem as always are not these characters, but the power structure that enables them, as well as the alien backing that the jew has, without which they are nothing and none of these characters would accomplish anything close to what they have done today.
 
Hitler was like a living God. He was the greatest leader and military strategist in the history of mankind. During the battle of France (May - June 1940) the Allies had twice as many tanks and guns as the Germans, and also the strategic advantage of being on the defense and the tactical advantages of mobility. The idea that the French army was badly prepared, poorly motivated and ill-equipped is just a myth and post-war propaganda. Germany's victory over France in just six weeks was a result of Hitler's military genius.

The best description of what was Hitler like that I've seen is The Enigma Of Adolf Hitler by Leon Degrelle. https://odysee.com/@Slammdcrxx:8/The-Enigma-of-Hitler-by-Lon-Degrelle-(What-was-Hitler-like):6

To compare Stalin to Hitler is absolutely ridiculous. Just to give you an example - Hitler was the greatest orator of all time. He has made more than 5,000 speeches. He made all of his speeches without reading off of paper, or anything like that. Hitler's speeches had such a great power over the people that even the people in the audience who were at first very critical or skeptical of his policies or ideas were swept away in the wave of emotion and frenzy which took over the hall and joined in the cheering and applause enthusiastically.

https://christogenea.org/system/files/video/HITLER_THE_MAN.mp4 I have watched this video hundreds of times, and still every time I hear the part where he says "They can suppress us. They can kill us if you like, but we will not capitulate!" my eyes get watery.

Now take a look at Stalin. He rarely appeared in public, rarely made public speeches, and he was incapable of delivering a speech without reading from a paper... He was probably the worst public speaker ever, even in November 1941, at the height of World War 2 his speech is so boring that it can put you to sleep. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkaJ6YnWws0 The cult of Stalin was based on extreme ideological coercion and terror. Nothing else. Even some present day politicians like Trump or Putin have greater leadership abilities than him. As a political and military strategist he was mediocre at best.

You are probably wondering why did Germany lose then? Because of the traitors in the German Army High Command. There were many top-ranking Wehrmacht generals and officers who not only conspired against Hitler, but deliberately worked for Germany's defeat...
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top