HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Back then, with the general level of living, being a "slave" to people like George Washington and that it would be pretty nice for anyone to be a "slave" of these people, since they had access to food and other abundance that was scarce in these times. They also had shelter and many other things that others didn't.
Now, if one was enslaved to a kike that worked them in the cotton business until they died, that is also the misfortune of the draw. That's why slavery has been abolished permanently. In Ancient Civilizations they didn't call it "slavery" in the strict way, and even the people that were supposed to be "Slaves" were to be treated with a certain given morality.
In Washington's Time and Franklin's views, this notion had to be abolished because people were being treated like cattle and non human [goyim in the jewish dictionary] so it was permanently abolished. Despite of labels, jews treat many people in the same way today, and in fact, most of humanity. So even if we abolished slavery, exploitation and unjust bargains are still everywhere we look in life.
Since now many are called "Free Men" but they are actually way more enslaved than all the "Slaves" of the Ancient World.
Many "slaves" had it way better than many "Free people" in the past, and it's all relative to one's Natal chart. There are people who live in a similar state today but live in luxury and have even more freedoms.
I think how something is titled is not more important than how anyone is treated, and many people today are called "Free" but they are far more enslaved in the actual way.
The rights to humanity for example are Constitutional and Unalienable, yet how many of those in power abuse people today? Too many. That has a lot to do with being a total kike, long story short.
I have read a lot of in-depth into the subject of "Slavery", and much of it isn't very different than how many people live today. In fact the situation now is far worse as anyone on this lower level, is abused and there is nothing that is done, since everyone is told that they are "Free" and nobody has a responsibility about anyone else anymore.
I am against slavery entirely and consider it a very bad thing, the above is though a situation of function, not a moralistic answer.
We cannot judge however the morals of "slavery" back then with our present day morals. It's also even stranger if you look into Ancient History that many "slaves, artisans" and other people, had a far better life than many "free people", and had rights to marry, shelter, food, access to books or other things that others couldn't even imagine.
In Ancient Greece there also existed one caste of "slaves" that was literally not working at all [no wage chasing], but had to take care of children, keep company to families, elderly and wives, and was nothing but a house butler like people have today too. It was sort of like a family advisor. These people were so closely bonded with the family that they also were buried together in many intervals. Sometimes these were orphans, widows, or people that were alone in life. As to not be alone, they were absorbed into other families etc.
These norms today can be extremely confusing. To understand how things were, one must try to bring their mind to the PAST, not how things are today. We abolished these now and for good reason, but to understand, we have to go back.
