With the means of art production we have today, having an altar of small, cheaply-made objects is actually disrespectful to Gods.
Doesn't your patron God deserve a proper statue? This is for you to answer.
I think you are stuck with a Christian mentality. A true God is understanding and does not need to see his followers draining all their savings to increase his ego.
This is a Christian mentality where the Jewish "god" has nothing really divine and appreciable, it is false and slave-owning, and the only thing that gives "value" to this fake entity is not a real advanced state, but as many submissive slaves, servile worship, humiliation and unjustified collections of masses of gold.
This is a typical Jewish thing: to value yourself based on how much you are able to subjugate, abuse and rob an innocent, and not to value your own understanding, compassion, helpfulness, for those in need.
Yes, the Gods certainly deserve all the good in the universe, there is no doubt about that, but they are the first ones who absolutely do not want their beloved followers to get into economic crisis because THEIR FOLLOWERS are what the Gods really love, not expensive gold statues.
For this reason, not only the rich should feel entitled to worship (in the SATANIC sense of the word) a God, because that God knows that the thing that REALLY has value lies in the follower's love, in his true feelings and in his relationship with him. Not in golden statues.
"Satan/Lucifer represents the common people. Unlike the Christian churches and all of their vast wealth, pomp, and ceremonial show, Satan does not expect his people to have expensive items for ritual. If all you have is yourself, this is fine with Satan. He understands"
-
One Disciple who was new but holy-minded, asked Astarte: “Queen, a Temple of Yours is being Destroyed, should I go there to defend your Temple from falling? That will bring you honor, would it not?”
Astarte responded: “No, you should not. My honor lies with you and not with marbles of stone that will perish as they are.”
-
From: