sublimesatanist
Active member
This is a difficult question I'm having to face.
The research I've done since 2020 regarding viruses has revealed to me that virology itself is something questionable and a large reason for the 'flu' is lack of Vitamin D from the sun and prolonged exposure to cold. I don't know what it's like in warmer countries but here winter is almost like a sea of leprosy.
The other thing I've found is that the virus has never been fully isolated or purified and it's pathogenicity wasn't verified using Koch's Postulates.
The 'isolation' was done in vitro (outside any living organism) combining green monkey kidney cells with antibiotics among other things. This results in cytokinesis and the "viruses" seen under a microscope are thus more likely to be exosomes, which in appearance are identical to (alleged) viruses.
They took these and tested them using the PCR test, looking for a certain genetic code. This test can be used on rocks and you could eventually find what you're looking for because of the number of cycles they use (30 and above).
Whether one believes in viruses or not I think it's of little consequence. I tend to be very black and white about things and I shouldn't question our teachers' validity because of it. Bias is really a pain but this is a part of being human I guess.
I also mean no disrespect to our teachers whatsoever. They know more about history and religion than I may ever know and I have the utmost respect, gratitude and admiration towards them. This is just a thought/feeling I felt I needed to get off my chest.
The research I've done since 2020 regarding viruses has revealed to me that virology itself is something questionable and a large reason for the 'flu' is lack of Vitamin D from the sun and prolonged exposure to cold. I don't know what it's like in warmer countries but here winter is almost like a sea of leprosy.
The other thing I've found is that the virus has never been fully isolated or purified and it's pathogenicity wasn't verified using Koch's Postulates.
The 'isolation' was done in vitro (outside any living organism) combining green monkey kidney cells with antibiotics among other things. This results in cytokinesis and the "viruses" seen under a microscope are thus more likely to be exosomes, which in appearance are identical to (alleged) viruses.
They took these and tested them using the PCR test, looking for a certain genetic code. This test can be used on rocks and you could eventually find what you're looking for because of the number of cycles they use (30 and above).
Whether one believes in viruses or not I think it's of little consequence. I tend to be very black and white about things and I shouldn't question our teachers' validity because of it. Bias is really a pain but this is a part of being human I guess.
I also mean no disrespect to our teachers whatsoever. They know more about history and religion than I may ever know and I have the utmost respect, gratitude and admiration towards them. This is just a thought/feeling I felt I needed to get off my chest.