CaspianTheDreamer said:
[...]
Thanks a lot for both of your replies. I spent nearly an hour focusing on myself and the descriptions on here and i could say im something between an Iranid and a Proto Iranid. Both my familys side have Luri ancestry ( native to almost the center civilizations of Iran ) and its kinda weird cuz everybody in my family tree looks vastly different from one another. There are some similiarities but its not very noticeable for example my aunts and uncles look really different from each other, same with grandparents and my own parents. Heck, not even my own sibling looks too similiar to me :lol: is this an effect of race or subrace mixing?
It depends on the degree of mixing. A consolidated/stable mix like "pure" Middle Eastern people (i.e. the Orientalid group) can have many similarities. If you notice, there is a lot of variation/diversity even in between Whites, because subraces can easily mix. I would say someone should avoid too much mixing even in subraces. For example, for White Europeans I would say that any Northern European subrace is alright mixing between them, any Middle European subrace is alright mixing between them, and any Southern European subrace is alright mixing between them. However, it wouldn't be good for the offspring if, for example, someone from a purely Northern European background mixed with someone from a purely Southern European background, as they are quite different. They shouldn't even live in the same countries, if not for short periods or for travel.
You could say the same between Western and Eastern Europeans. And I am sure similar considerations apply to other race. Other than genetic compatibility being lower, there are also things like climate, psychology, and other factors to take into account. "Abominations" like blonde/red guys with either tan skin or brown eyes are born, and one can see that it doesn't look like a good genetic makeup. Mixes rarely turn out to be superior. They generally turn out quite inferior, especially if they are done randomly rather than through calculated eugenic manipulations. Climate ties in with the concept of ecosystem you see in animals.
Anyway, I am diverging too much from your question. Regarding the racial origins of the Orientalid race, HP Hooded Cobra will definitely be able to give you a clearer reply. I think he mentioned something in the past in another topic, but I can't remember which topic was it. In the same topic, I think he had also spoken about the Japanese and the Indian people.
In regards to descendants of Sumerians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Hittites, etc. one should keep in mind the population back then was very different, as climates and ecosystems worldwide were very different. I believe those traits can only be found in the Iranian Nordoid subrace, when taking the current Middle Eastern population as a simple. This is because the cradles of civilisation that survived in post-diluvian (post nuclear warfare) times were majority, if not exclusively, of the Nordid variety.
Disclaimer: When I use antediluvian and post-diluvian, I don't refer to the abrahamic event (that was stolen from Sumerian mythology anyway), but I refer to the times when the Gods were with us (antediluvian) and after the Gods departed (post-diluvian). I also refer to the event that acted as a catalyst for their departure: the Reptilians attacking Planet Earth (and Mars) with nuclear weapons. Sites that were the target of Reptilians still can be found, some of which still have high levels of radioactivity. Examples of these sites are in India (there are inhabited city ruins), North America, Australia, the Saharan region, the Middle East, Greenland... Every desert in the world is a result of this, as the desert ecosystem is not a natural ecosystem, but the most likely result of widespread nuclear attacks. This is why Mars is a desert planet.
The other event that is also a primer for the distinction is more a
theory than a fact. The Phaeton planet theory. Allegedly, a planet that existed between Mars and Jupiter was blown up by the enemy. This event created the asteroid belt, the Moon (which replaced Phaeton in birth charts, leading to a complete overhaul in many spiritual practices), the tilt in the Earth's axis (which was straight before, and again lead to ramifications in spirituality). The tilt in the axis is also what created seasons and the increased variety in ecosystems and climates we have today. In the past, there was ALLEGEDLY a worldwide temperate climate resembling what Ireland, Britain, New Zealand, the Netherlands, and very few other areas have today. Ice Ages never happened. In fact, the Ice Age theory is very unlikely.
End of disclaimer :lol: