ShadowTheRaven
Well-known member
I'll quote your reasoning one argument at a time.
I'm bothered because an open-border policy between European countries would only be ideal if there were only European inhabitants but if I or you went to Paris, what would we see? Nothing but Moroccans and Algerians, not a actual French Parisian to be found. The solution to terrorists moving from country to country to evade capture, or set up attacks is to have basic border security and checkpoints. Yes, this will restrict movement, but this will also restrict the movement of guns, bombs, or other contraband.
And there is no border in-between countries to mitigate their movement. At any moment a migrant set up in Germany could easily move to the Netherlands, France, Italy, Switzerland, and so on if he were to receive orders to attack those specific countries.
It's not entirely corrupted because so far, Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic haven't taken in migrants and as a result haven't seen a bombing, mass shooting, van ramming, or stabbing in years.
And the best way to remedy this is to deny the jew the methods of taxation and enforcement against European interest. How are you going to do this when they've infested the EU commission where members don't have term limits, are unelected and can't be removed? You would have to focus every aspect of governance on the Parliament to preserve democracy.
Clearly you have never heard of NATO which encompasses almost all EU member states plus the US, Canada, the UK, and Turkey. The EU army is established to create a military wing of tyranny which when the end goal is achieved, no civilian may fight back or else be gunned down. NATO has the same idea, to where if a member state is threatened or stability is threatened then NATO countries will take action. There's no need for an EU army.
Even if Europe's governments existed without jews and non-whites, problems within a country is solved more efficiently on the national level. That doesn't mean cooperation between European countries on an economic and military level cannot exist, it's not an all vs none argument.
Syd Silver said:You keep mention the borders inside EU, are you bothered because are no borders between European countries ?! because are no fences between Aryans !
I'm bothered because an open-border policy between European countries would only be ideal if there were only European inhabitants but if I or you went to Paris, what would we see? Nothing but Moroccans and Algerians, not a actual French Parisian to be found. The solution to terrorists moving from country to country to evade capture, or set up attacks is to have basic border security and checkpoints. Yes, this will restrict movement, but this will also restrict the movement of guns, bombs, or other contraband.
Syd Silver said:Who is doing the terrorist atacks, rappings, murders, robbery and so on ? all this is done by non-EU immigrants send by jews, yes the Kalergy plan its still on, so if you remove blacks, muslims, pakis, gypsies and what else jews sended then you don't need fences inside Europe but you definely need to guard the external borders on high level
The EU external border was opened by jews, that is the problem
And there is no border in-between countries to mitigate their movement. At any moment a migrant set up in Germany could easily move to the Netherlands, France, Italy, Switzerland, and so on if he were to receive orders to attack those specific countries.
Syd Silver said:The European Union government doesn't work in the best interest for Europe all the time or most of the time because of the jews, yes sadly but many jews are in EU government and many countries are run by them directly or through their pupets, but still EU is not entirely corrupted
It's not entirely corrupted because so far, Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic haven't taken in migrants and as a result haven't seen a bombing, mass shooting, van ramming, or stabbing in years.
Syd Silver said:EU acted against jewis interests several times even in the actual state, think about that, see the last example 2 days ago
https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=32618
So if the EU government will actually be clean aka without jews ...
The jews are the ones with high tax charges and working against Europe's interest and doing their best to divide us and destroy our countries and our Race
And the best way to remedy this is to deny the jew the methods of taxation and enforcement against European interest. How are you going to do this when they've infested the EU commission where members don't have term limits, are unelected and can't be removed? You would have to focus every aspect of governance on the Parliament to preserve democracy.
Syd Silver said:And about the EU army why you think is such a bad idea, what if Russia decide to invade a EU country like they did with Crimea?(yes i know Crimea is not in EU but the threat is the same) then what ? a single EU country can't fight Russia, all EU countries rely on U.S. when it comes to that, but honestly can we really rely on U.S. jewis government when it comes to a war against jewis Russia ?
Clearly you have never heard of NATO which encompasses almost all EU member states plus the US, Canada, the UK, and Turkey. The EU army is established to create a military wing of tyranny which when the end goal is achieved, no civilian may fight back or else be gunned down. NATO has the same idea, to where if a member state is threatened or stability is threatened then NATO countries will take action. There's no need for an EU army.
Syd Silver said:Picture Europe's governments without jews and Europe without non-white immigrants, do you still see problems inside our countries do you still need borders and fences between Aryans ?
We need to be United.
Even if Europe's governments existed without jews and non-whites, problems within a country is solved more efficiently on the national level. That doesn't mean cooperation between European countries on an economic and military level cannot exist, it's not an all vs none argument.