I notice when many homosexual people think about children, rarely, they put any thought in the children themselves.
Up until a point it makes sense, after a point, it becomes full blown insanity to debate these matters. The jewish examples have to be ridden off and I notice many homosexuals, even-though they claim they are away from jewish thinking, they still are influenced by it.
If one quits sexually speaking from the process of creating life, why should one put their hands all the time on other life? Or directly father? If that was their objective, wouldn't they be able to do such with the opposite gender? In other words one needs to have clearness of goals. If one still debates having children, this can imply that someone is not as strictly homosexual as one may have thought before, or such urges wouldn't really exist.
If you for some reason decide you want kids, then you may also need to ask what your kids would want from you. What kind of images? What kinds of influences? And you need self judgement aka, how would YOU influence your children?
Children if they are exposed to bizarrities from the parents, heterosexual in cases of such, the state takes them away. Generations pasts, homosexual people, always had normal parents most of the time, imperfect as they were. And things were mostly fine for homosexuals. Nobody considered parenting children in a house with two daddies and two mommies until now, and this is because of the jews.
The human brain as it's designed it requires a mother, and a father. Incarnate, in a body. If either is missing from the life this can create problems in the mentality of a person, such as serious voids and lacking in the soul. The infant brain doesn't understand yin and yang it understands normal figures such as mom and dad, grandma and grandpa. And absence or confusion in such can have life altering effects, to the point of disaster as well.
Children, for optimal mental development, need a mother, and a father. Even absence of such creates serious problems, and even in otherwise perfect conditions problems can still arise. I don't wanna know nor I consider experimentation done by people on children, no matter how much they think they 'love them', to be exposed on images that are simply clashing with the biological foundation of the human brain, such as drag queen daddy, and gender queer bi-tranny, nanny. This is why from nature you have the mother and the father who are able to get pregnant, not two women or two men together. Homosexual birds and other animals do not father, they do other things which are useful for their species. They may take care of children or the larger tribe or species in some way, but they do not directly father anyone.
If a person who is a homosexual had a child, they should still maintain a family, or at least, do not brush such influences in the face of their children, which is typical of many forceful homosexuals who pompously go around saying they have adopted children. Certainly, they can be better than let's say a couple of drunkard and heterosexual abusers, but still, there is no point to get into this debate, the state recognizes such crimes but newfound problematic relations such as heterosexuals parenting children we scarcely know about. Being care takers like aunts, surely, yes.
But full blown parenting cannot happen by two people of the same gender. Males cannot breastfeed, no matter how much hormones you put into them, and not matter how feminine one's energy is, it will never be the energy of a mother or a woman, if one is a male. Humans are very confused as it is. However this is only bullshit theory, and in practice, that would be impossible unless one lives in the Almost Jewnited States of America.
The enemy has been deliberately trying to ruin the mind of innocent children such as trans and drag queens that go and adopt poor children, dress them like hookers from a young age, and do other deplorable things which they consider normal to them. If I was working on a cabaret, sniffing lines, and was surrounded by 10 hookers everyday, I wouldn't have children as a hetero either, let alone bring them to such hazardous environment. So it's not really a 'gender debate' as much as it is about imagery that ruins the human brain.
Not long ago I saw in the news a homosexual female couple enforced a 4 year old in "Gender changing surgery". Because according to these demented individuals, the child "asked for it". Now do you ask a 4 year old and consider it to be an entity that can make such life changing choices for themselves? There is obvious hatred here, and the insecurity of the mad "parents", went onward and destroyed itself. This is like asking your kid what does it think of heroin since it sees you inject it everyday, and then using "good" as a viable reply to inject your kid with heroin. Only, the situation above is far worse and IRREVERSIBLE.
It's psychology basics, children mimic what they see until they form their own understanding of self which happens around 9 years old, and around 12 years old, the children start to have their own understanding and their own choices. Effectively the child here didn't really know anything about itself, and it was put to do life altering surgery because the parents wanted to feel better about themselves and treat the child as a chihuahua dog. This is depravity and insanity, and dishonors homosexuals, and not only that, it arises social hatred, and the jew knows this.
No, I do not believe homosexual people should get children, simply because, homosexual parenting can cause issues on children. In the cases where people have children, they should let them have their own choices, and not enforce anything on them such as the paradigms above. Because this is a crime of extreme evil.
The mentality of "I adopt because I can" and to hell with whatever happens to the child, because I want to be "Me" and wear pink tiaras and do strange acts in front of my kid is bad. Even improper actions between heterosexual couples can scar a kid for life.
Homosexuals and many others are a minority and I know some of them will not like my reply, because the Jewnited States and the Jews state you can do 'whatever the fuck you want'. I know many homosexuals dislike the fact that others may have forced them to be heterosexuals, and frequently do dislike impositions on their behavior by others, which is normal. So why do these people cannot see that imposing certain visual images to children is wrong...
There are a lot of theories and endless conversations on such matters which makes it look like these people are a majority. The fact we accept some things it doesn't mean that we bizarre rules on other human beings.
If I myself were a homosexual, or I had a male partner, I would never adopt a kid, male or female, no matter how much I would 'feel like' I should do it, as my life would be based around my partner(s), goals, and spiritual development. Kids are not guinea pigs that one has to get in order to feel 'complete', they are beings of their own character as well. And chances are if the kid will not be a natural homosexual, this will create mind ruin for the kid to watch images that do not agree with their inner nature, same as homosexual children who are enforced by their parents to act "heterosexual". So to avoid such risks I would avoid adoption.
People who want to make a full blown freak show in front of children so that they themselves feel 'natural and complete', are abominations, and behaviors of abominations are not tolerated in Satanism as we are for security and peace for children and innocents.
Homosexual and other people can help children and actively help civilization become better in other points of advantage such as donating to adoption houses and many other things. One can be creative. Homosexuals when they exist in a family, in a hypothetical scenario, where White families would have many children, would be uncles and aunts to many, they would have children they could actually care about, and they would be loved by their family, and accepted. This is the case actually for many homosexual people, cousins etc.
Uncles and other influences such as a godfather are good, but to directly parent children, I am against, for reasons of spiritual imprints and the love the jews have for this depravity and how much they have enforced it.
The only case where such would be debatable and still fucking LAME, would be if the father was a closet or secretly homosexual from their kid. Aka, no images on their kid, and let natural development take it's course. Everyone can have their own experience but in front of developing creatures we have to act in a way that our brain is designed to understand. However judging from cases of, for example, heterosexual but very effeminate dads, this can still have complications for the child. The same goes for a heterosexual mother that is acting like a whore in front of her kids.
So I don't want to debate the obvious here what seeing your two daddies walking around with cowboy boots and kissing is going to do to the fragile brains of children. This is an act of hate and insanity.
The jews must make a good oily fap everytime they hear stories such as how the goyim mutilate the genitals and do gender surgery on infants that don't even have an opinion on what their gender and their sexual preferences are.
I do not condone any of such fucking insanity.