About global warming

[TheCrimsonScythe1]

There is many a time in my 15 trips around the sun that I have come across Christians and other related filth that they try to convince me global warming isn't real. This is to weaken and shorten humanities lifespan. They want nothing more then to destroy the earth and cripple it to a point where it can not be repaired.

We need to take action, the Gods have warned of the destruction of earth for eons, but I believe the destruction of earth will ultimately be caused by Christians and other related ilk.

If we keep sending CO2 emissions in the atmosphere the ocean will become more acidic, leaving creatures that build shells defenseless.

The solution is simple as it seems. Go green energy. But the US gov't as well as China and other countries dont want to do this. Why? Money. They want to be able to recieve the money they produce from oil as well as gas and other fossil fuels. China heavily depends on coal production and cares little about the air they are polluting in their own country.

We need to stop this insanity. This will take years, maybe even decades. But I urge you to seek ways to become self dependent and using gas. Buy yourself a nice Electric Tesla.

In order to create, we must first destroy what once was. The government needs to care more about the people then the Elitists or the corrupt.

 

[Voice of Enki [JG]]

There is a reason why Co2 emissions being said to be the cause of this mythical phenomenon of global warming is questionable at best.

currently, Co2 makes up about 0.04% of the atmosphere. Before the industrial revolution 200 years ago, that percentage was roughly 0.03%.

This 0.01% does not make the difference or the cause behind the climate changes that are occurring. Local effects of pollution are certainly very real, however these emissions are the smallest part of the pollution problem, and certainly they are not the cause for rising of temperatures or melting of polar ice.

Far larger issues are the material pollution of the environment, water wastage, over industrialization which ruins habitats and is non sustainable.

We could put out 10 times the Co2 and it wouldn't have a crippling impact on the overall atmosphere of the Earth to be honest, the largest problems it would cause would be localized pollution, such as the perpetual smog in industrial districts in China (Where Co2 is the least of the problems), or the air pollution experienced by England during the early "industrial revolution", but this only affects small urban centers, the planet itself, and the global climate are completely unaffected by this.

People forget that the planet is massive. Things which affect the planet on a global scale have to be absolutely massive.

A single giant volcanic eruption puts out more atmospheric pollution than china and the US emit combined in over a decade, and the planet doesn't care, nature is only temporarily affected in local areas (Unless it is a super volcanic eruption, which is known to be able to cause global temperature drops due to the huge amount of sulfur rich matter ejected into the stratosphere).

Global warming being the idea that our emissions are causing heat to remain trapped on the earth and accumulate over time, thus increasing global temperatures, which is simply not true as our civilizations emissions are such an absolutely puny quantity of matter compared to the global atmosphere. Naturally occurring emissions from forest fires over many hundreds of years, as well as other natural events like volcanic eruptions are far more significant and have been going on for millions of years without ever "destroying" the earths habitability permanently.

Human caused pollution is certainly real, and is certainly a real concern, however the global warming thing is nothing more than an agenda and a buzzword used by the nwo to elicit control and to distract the andrapoda.

 

[Voice of Enki [JG]]

The solution is simple as it seems. Go green energy. But the US gov't as well as China and other countries dont want to do this. Why? Money. They want to be able to recieve the money they produce from oil as well as gas and other fossil fuels. China heavily depends on coal production and cares little about the air they are polluting in their own country.

Green energy also isn't what people are led to believe.

For one, the maintenance life of wind turbines and solar panels are very short, they require a huge amount of raw material to produce, none of which is recyclable for the foreseeable future, and all of which are very polluting to the environment when disposed of.

Electric cars? Lithium batteries are impossible to recycle and are extremely toxic to the environment when left around somewhere after they are used.

Dams? Just look at America and see how that is going.. They changes they make to the environment are massive and they produce comparatively small amounts of electricity, they also cannot be installed en mass along rivers, especially not if you care to maintain the natural fresh water ecosystems.

Solar panels are not the future, they require so many resources, worse than growing millions of acres of rapeseed oil to create bio fuel. They also do not produce nearly as much energy as people would hope. You'd need to cover half the pacific ocean with solar panels to sustain the worlds energy needs, and before you even finish laying down half of them the ones you have laid need to be replaced due to erosion and other forms of damage. Not to mention the infrastructure required to build and run this.

These things are not as energy efficient or as "green" as anyone leads you to believe.

The "greenest" form of energy currently available on Earth, is unironically nuclear power. It has a bad stigma, due to the nature of nuclear waste and the nuclear weaponry that has been made with that technology, however it is the least polluting of all forms of energy generation developed on Earth currently, especially if this is build and ran intelligently (Not incompetently like the Japanese Fukushima reactor...).

To really solve the issue of sustainability and pollution regarding the energy needs of our civilization, entirely new systems of energy generation need to be developed which do not exist here yet. Stuff that doesn't take copious amounts of resources to build and maintain, and does not rely on a fossil fuel material as input.

Tesla was onto something real here, by deriving energy from the Earths own electromagnetic field, and the Earth's rotation, which generates a huge amount of ambient energy which can be captured with the right technology, to derive energy from with "0" input.

Unfortunately, this had been shut down and Tesla's technology was never able to reach full fruition on Earth, thus we are stuck here with these archaic methods for now, none of which are truly suitable for long term sustainability of our civilizations growing energy needs, of which nuclear and potentially the implausible but possible development of nuclear fusion to derive energy are the lesser evils and the best bet for Earth at the current time.

 

[Egon]

"Green energy" is a govt scam: https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?p=386855#p386855
You should understand the psychology why the govt push so hard the "electric/automated cars" bullshit as the "alternative" for impressionable people easy to be manipulated under the "global warming" scam by making even more environmentally disastrous and expensive "green" technology for the Goyim. "You will own nothing and you will be happy":
https://odysee.com/@AncestralCult:0/-A-simpler-Life--vs--You-will-own-Nothing-and-be-Happy--X:c

 

[Satanic Avenger 666]

There is many a time in my 15 trips around the sun that I have come across Christians and other related filth that they try to convince me global warming isn't real. This is to weaken and shorten humanities lifespan. They want nothing more then to destroy the earth and cripple it to a point where it can not be repaired.

No, the global warming hoax is a hoax invented by globalists who use it to impose a global dictatorship. See for example the 15 minute prison cities, Netherlands trying to kill cows and force farmers to give up their land causing many of them to commit suicides, the Agenda 21/2030 which involves depopulation e.t.c. It's a total scam.

Mostly the WEF, the UN and other humanity-hating globalists promote it.

It's based on fake stats, fake theories and fake temperature graphs.

They are also hypocrites and travel in private jets while they tell people to eat bugs instead of meat.

The truth is, there is a slight warming but it's from natural causes like the El Nino. Warming is good, because the vast majority of deaths happen from cold, not hot weather. More warming means less cold weather therefore less deaths. CO2 causes the earth to become greener and trees produce more fruit, as it's important to all plants.

If we keep sending CO2 emissions in the atmosphere the ocean will become more acidic, leaving creatures that build shells defenseless.

No, it won't. This has been debunked already.

The solution is simple as it seems. Go green energy.

"Green energy" is a scam. Wind turbines cause much damage to the environment by killing bats and birds and are largely ineffective. The only reason politicians are obsessed with them is because they receive generous grants.

But the US gov't as well as China and other countries dont want to do this. Why? Money

The fact is that those who promote the Big Climate scam receive much more money than Big Oil.

They want to be able to recieve the money they produce from oil as well as gas and other fossil fuels.

The no such thing as a "fossil fuel". The term was invented by the Rockefellers in the late 1800's so they can have a monopoly on oil and raise its price by pretending it's scarce and valuable. Oil is really produced naturally from the earth's magma, not from "fossils".

Buy yourself a nice Electric Tesla.

You cause more damage to the environment by making batteries from electric cars than simply using normal cars.

 

[Stormblood]

...

What do you think of better sources than both "green" energy and oil? For example, nuclear fusion.

Do you have any idea of how we could make better cars that have more sustainable energy sources and are also silent? Silent cars would really in today's world as everyone could at least meditate in peace without car noise annoying them. The alternative to silent cars would be to have soundproof houses but that would mean dismantling the majority of houses and rebuilding them to a proper standard. It would also not work too well because windows need to be open often, which defeats the purpose of soundproof homes.

I'm not criticising your post. I know that global warming is a hoax (just like ice ages). I'm looking for beneficial changes, as improvement is the goal of life.

 

[StyleCoin]

There is many a time in my 15 trips around the sun that I have come across Christians and other related filth that they try to convince me global warming isn't real. This is to weaken and shorten humanities lifespan. They want nothing more then to destroy the earth and cripple it to a point where it can not be repaired.

No, the global warming hoax is a hoax invented by globalists who use it to impose a global dictatorship. See for example the 15 minute prison cities, Netherlands trying to kill cows and force farmers to give up their land causing many of them to commit suicides, the Agenda 21/2030 which involves depopulation e.t.c. It's a total scam.

Mostly the WEF, the UN and other humanity-hating globalists promote it.

It's based on fake stats, fake theories and fake temperature graphs.

They are also hypocrites and travel in private jets while they tell people to eat bugs instead of meat.

The truth is, there is a slight warming but it's from natural causes like the El Nino. Warming is good, because the vast majority of deaths happen from cold, not hot weather. More warming means less cold weather therefore less deaths. CO2 causes the earth to become greener and trees produce more fruit, as it's important to all plants.

If we keep sending CO2 emissions in the atmosphere the ocean will become more acidic, leaving creatures that build shells defenseless.

No, it won't. This has been debunked already.

The solution is simple as it seems. Go green energy.

"Green energy" is a scam. Wind turbines cause much damage to the environment by killing bats and birds and are largely ineffective. The only reason politicians are obsessed with them is because they receive generous grants.

But the US gov't as well as China and other countries dont want to do this. Why? Money

The fact is that those who promote the Big Climate scam receive much more money than Big Oil.

They want to be able to recieve the money they produce from oil as well as gas and other fossil fuels.

The no such thing as a "fossil fuel". The term was invented by the Rockefellers in the late 1800's so they can have a monopoly on oil and raise its price by pretending it's scarce and valuable. Oil is really produced naturally from the earth's magma, not from "fossils".

Buy yourself a nice Electric Tesla.

You cause more damage to the environment by making batteries from electric cars than simply using normal cars.

Dude, is this serious? Oil is produced by the earth's magma? Could you send me some sources so I can study these subjects?

 

[AFODO]

I read things in this thread that I never knew, and is fascinating. Hopefully these will be elaborated/confirmed later.

 

[Imhotep]

I agree with Voice of Enki and also Satanic Avenger 666. The volcanic eruptions emit more CO2 into the atmosphere than 10 megacities put together. And yet hardly anything changes in the composition of the air. That has always been the case. Added to this is the activity of the sun, which increases and decreases again. This temporarily leads to a small ice age or warm period with a time delay. The IPCC report is being deliberately manipulated. Anyone who does not follow the NWO agenda today is deliberately ignored as a scientist or financially "cold-cocked".

In fact, to add to what Voice of Enki has already excellently addressed, Li batteries are more than harmful to the environment. For Russia, the war in Ukraine is partly about getting hold of the coveted lithium as the raw material of the future.

Green energy" is a marketing scam. It consumes far too much infrastructure and is far too inefficient depending on the weather.

The whole agenda only serves to enable the globalists to make even more money. They are in no way interested in the well-being of the people. Most globalists are Jews anyway.

The pneumatic car, which was ready for series production and only ran on air, was taken off the market, as was the car that ran on a magnesium hydride engine. The lobbyists in the automotive industry are not interested in real innovations, as long as they don't bring money into their coffers.

Hail Satan!

Hail Lucifer!

Hail Wotan!

 

[SatAnon]

This has been answered above, but let me add some things:

It's the globalists that convinced you that the global warming hoax is real so you will accept their totalitarian solutions, like eating bugs and owning nothing and being happy. Funny how all the solutions to the "global warming" involve totalitarian things like "smart cities", now repackaged as "15-minute cities" where you will be tracked with cameras and spied upon and have your movement restricted, or the government controlling your emissions and only allowing you to eat a sausage a month or banning meat altogether and replacing it with goyslop like "synthetic meat".

I mean, there is even such thing as "ecoauthoritarianism":

Ecoauthoritarianism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There's not a global warming problem, there's a totalitarian globalist problem.

If these globalists are gone, the "problem" will be fixed.

And all this EV hype, they are a failure and much more expensive than normal cars. There are insurance companies that refuse to insure EVs because it's impossible to stop them from burning down if they catch fire. If an electric car catches fire (which is very easy), it can burn down an entire ship:

Electric Car Blamed for Deadly Fire on Cargo Ship Carrying 3,000 Cars – The Daily Sceptic

An electric car has been linked to a fire on a cargo ship carrying nearly 3,000 vehicles in the North Sea which killed one person and forced others to jump overboard.

dailysceptic.org

 

[Havoc]

I think you have the right spirit even if Co2 is not a big deal.

The constant dumping of chemicals and garbage into our waterways and oceans is causing big problems, the constant over mining over fishing and over farming are having its toll.

The endless pumping of resources food and housing into the third world and welfare recipients is stripping the earth of its natural places and degrading humanity at the same time. Ever notice how the people who push the narrative of environmental apocalypsum the most are the same ones who work tirelessly to ensure the expansion of sub humanity? To jews it’s not their massive horde of orcs that are the problem it’s cow farts and carbon dioxide (the stuff plants breathe.)

The problem with modern environmentalism is that it’s built around consuming, they say we need more power plants, new cars and solar panels on every roof an endless stream of crap we don’t need will not bring back the rain forests we cut down to make a lithium mine.

Wind and solar plants require massive amounts of resources and land to build but produce vastly less output meaning we need more and more of them to replace a few coal plants. We should only replace things that are outdated and replace them with more efficient things.

 

[SatAnon]

And we do have actual environmental problems, like pollution. But these can't be exploited for totalitarianism, that's why they don't talk about them much.

Honestly if there was a global warming problem, you would expect these things:

1) Most of the governments would adapt their policies to cope with it and adapt their infrastructure to it instead of spending money and time on fearmongering.

2)They would provide solutions that respect individual freedom, instead of pushing totalitarianism. There are plenty of them, like living in harmony with nature, living a simple life and leaving the cities for small towns and villages.

3)Most of those liberals and elites who believe that the civilization will collapse would learn practical and survival skills and store food and resources to prepare for it and they would move away from coastal cities, i.e. doing the opposite of what they do now.

4)They would sell all their private jets and ride bikes instead, and stop taking their private jets every year to Davos to plan how to impose totalitarianism together with the other globalists.