Other #77313 If someone is around 70% white

[AskSatanOperator]

Are they considered white, or are they non-white? Is it a bad idea to have children with them? For example Keanu Reeves

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

If you are mixed then you are mixed. There is no question.

 

[616Taysha]

The only problem is jewishness. The rest is of lesser importance. The jew is a taint. The human is a budding God.

 

[OttoHart]

Prefacing this with the statement that all Gentile races can evolve spiritually, so there's no need to "wish you were White".
Souls that are mixed and include white, are mixed. Depending on who you ask, this soul can be considered Black/Asian, or be considered mixed.
I lean towards mixed being a thing of its own spiritually.

White souls, however, can only incarnate into white bodies, partially due to whiteness being recessive.

 

[Seeker in the Dark]

You can't honestly tell me Whites don't have some sort of advantage by being "direct descendants of the Gods".

But also, where is the evidence that people held that view in the ancient world? Greeks held white and non-white non-Greeks as both barbarians.

They had far more respect and saw more of themselves in the non-white Egyptians, who by the time the Greeks became a major culture, were clearly mostly or entirely mixed, as can be evidently seen in the Egyptian arts.

The importance of Aryaness seems to come from Hindus and Persians, and it was transferred to the Europeans who were also Aryan by lineage, but didn't seem to place much importance on it.

Where are the ancient texts of Romans, Greeks, Celts, Scythians or Germanics boasting about their Aryan heritage? You won't find any, or I didn't find any anyway. That doesn't mean there isn't a common Indo-European ancestry between Europeans, Persians and Indians. There is, genetic studies prove it, but Europeans didn't seem to care about it that much. European value on Aryan heritage seems to come mainly around the 18th-20th centuries.

But also, where is the proof that the ancients, such as Greeks or Romans believed White Europeans were the direct descendants of the Gods? This sounds more like a modern idea to me.

All the European traits can be explained by natural evolution: fair skin, light hair, blue/green eyes could have all arisen from mutations, as we have examples of aboriginals mutating blond hair or asians mutating light skin convergently and so on. That doesn't prove Divine lineage.

What would be good evidence that Whites indeed are direct children of the Gods as TOZ claims? We'd expect to find alien DNA in Whites that can't be explained or traced back to any living thing on earth or other non-white humans(not counting mixed people), or perhaps the modern science industry is suppressing that?

All evidence given will be appreciated.

 

[AskSatanOperator]

If you are mixed then you are mixed. There is no question.

HPS Maxine said most white people are around 80% pure... so what is the threshold?

 

[HPS Lydia]

Where are the ancient texts of Romans, Greeks, Celts, Scythians or Germanics boasting about their Aryan heritage?

They didn't need to boast. People are who they are, there was no need to spend time boasting about it. There were other matters to attend to like personal development, refining culture, and building civilization. It's only these days with so many migrants and our governments spending massive amounts of money on other races that Whites are feeling suffocated in our own lands.

Btw the name Ireland is from Eireann, pronounced Aryan.

But also, where is the proof that the ancients, such as Greeks or Romans believed White Europeans were the direct descendants of the Gods? This sounds more like a modern idea to me.

Irish and Scottish ancient writings, that we are literally descended from the Fey folk, which is what they called the Gods. It is not a modern idea since the writings were already around for a long time.

What would be good evidence that Whites indeed are direct children of the Gods as TOZ claims?

The Gods themselves have told us. Aside from that good luck finding evidence, it would be considered "racist" and suppressed everywhere else.


Whatever race or mix-race a member is, the Gods look out for you and want you to advance yourself to your fullest potential.

 

[DarkPagan666]

All evidence given will be appreciated.

It is a misconception to think that ancient Europeans needed to "boast" about Aryan or racial heritage in the way modern people might expect. Ancient identity was certainly tied to lineage, divine ancestry, and cultural achievement, but it was expressed through myth, linguistics, tradition, and living civilization, and not through modern political slogans.

The word Arya originally comes from Indo-Iranian traditions, where it meant "noble" or "honorable." It was a cultural and moral designation, not strictly racial in the modern sense. To be Arya was to embody a high standard of civilization, virtue, and spirituality - qualities which naturally flourished among White Europeans and are reflected in the civilization of the West. It was also a title that, in theory, could be attained by any people who lived up to it.

Genetic studies have confirmed that many Europeans share common ancestors responsible for traits like blue eyes and pale skin, tracing back as far as 10,000 years ago (and likely earlier) around the Black Sea region. These people became prominent in northern and western Europe over time, which formed an essential part of the heritage of White European peoples.

Ancient burial evidence, such as Egyptian graves containing naturally blonde, red-haired, and ash-brown mummies, was arranged with care and accompanied by valuable goods, suggests that physical characteristics like lighter hair were recognized and respected even in ancient civilizations.

As for ancestral origins, many European traditions describe descent from divine, shining, or otherworldly ancestors, often associated with light, beauty, and nobility:

• Irish and Scottish myths speak of the Tuatha Dé Danann, god-like beings of immense beauty and radiance, regarded as the ancestors of noble lineages.
  
  
• Norse mythology describes the first humans, Ask and Embla, created by gods like Odin, Vili, and Vé. The gods themselves, especially Balder and the light elves (Ljósálfar), are portrayed as luminous, fair, and radiant - "brighter than the sun to look upon." Balder, god of beauty, innocence, and light, is described in Prose Edda as so bright and fair that "light shines from him."
  
  
• Germanic traditions, recorded by Tacitus, emphasize the purity and indigenous origin of the Germanic tribes, who believed they descended from divine figures like Tuisto and Mannus. The runes themselves hold hidden ancestral knowledge that gives clues to this. Example from 'Wikipedia on Tuisto':
  
  
  • For example, Tiwaz giving the meaning "son of Tiu". Tuisto is connected through linguistics as the son of the sky-god Dyeus (the Proto-Indo-European root for Zeus).
    
    
• Slavic mythology describes descent from Dazhbog, the sun god, symbolizing divine ancestry through the light. Example from Dazbog:
  
  
  • "Dazh" relates to "day" or "giving," while "Bog" means "god." Dazhbog is described as dwelling in the east, in a golden palace under the land of eternal summer, and being the son of Svarog - the Slavic sky god equivalent to Dyaus of the Vedic tradition. Dyaus Pitar = Deus / Diespiter = Zeus Pater.
    
    
• Even in Greek mythology, heroes and gods such as Apollo and Achilles are described as golden-haired (Xanthos) and shining, with divine beauty and radiance.

The name Ireland (Éire or Éireann) also carries ancient linguistic and ancestral echoes that connect back to the Indo-European Arya, which reflects deep-rooted links between European peoples and the older Aryan concept of noble and divine lineage.

Thus, ancient Europeans did not frame their identity around modern racial ideas, they clearly described and remembered their origins through myth, language, and tradition: descent from radiant, noble, and divine ancestors. Their sense of identity was spiritual and ancestral, embedded in a living civilization, not in the politicized narratives that arose much later in history.

 

[WoadWarrior]

You can't honestly tell me Whites don't have some sort of advantage by being "direct descendants of the Gods".

But also, where is the evidence that people held that view in the ancient world? Greeks held white and non-white non-Greeks as both barbarians.

They had far more respect and saw more of themselves in the non-white Egyptians, who by the time the Greeks became a major culture, were clearly mostly or entirely mixed, as can be evidently seen in the Egyptian arts.

The importance of Aryaness seems to come from Hindus and Persians, and it was transferred to the Europeans who were also Aryan by lineage, but didn't seem to place much importance on it.

Where are the ancient texts of Romans, Greeks, Celts, Scythians or Germanics boasting about their Aryan heritage? You won't find any, or I didn't find any anyway. That doesn't mean there isn't a common Indo-European ancestry between Europeans, Persians and Indians. There is, genetic studies prove it, but Europeans didn't seem to care about it that much. European value on Aryan heritage seems to come mainly around the 18th-20th centuries.

But also, where is the proof that the ancients, such as Greeks or Romans believed White Europeans were the direct descendants of the Gods? This sounds more like a modern idea to me.

All the European traits can be explained by natural evolution: fair skin, light hair, blue/green eyes could have all arisen from mutations, as we have examples of aboriginals mutating blond hair or asians mutating light skin convergently and so on. That doesn't prove Divine lineage.

What would be good evidence that Whites indeed are direct children of the Gods as TOZ claims? We'd expect to find alien DNA in Whites that can't be explained or traced back to any living thing on earth or other non-white humans(not counting mixed people), or perhaps the modern science industry is suppressing that?

All evidence given will be appreciated.

Nobody boasted for the same reason nobody boasted about having two arms, it was just kind of the default of their civilizations, their was very little immigration so it was pointless to even mention it really.

As for advantages and so forth, maybe? I mean Zeus's Empire is vast and many beings declare Him their Sovereign, some of these beings do not resemble us at all, and many are very very powerful it dosent seem to have held them back, Pazuzu is said to be of a differing species compared to Human and the species our Deities make up; and yet He was worshipped and has been testified to be very powerful and compassionate and is a rightful Daimon.

Even amongst Humanity we all posses differing limitations which extend far beyond mere race, for instance lets compare the average Zevist to Lady Maxine when She was HPS, there simply isnt a comparison, She was and is beyond by default even if the average Zevist achieves Deification they will not achieve parity with such a person as well we know there are hierarchies even amongst the Gods, its best to focus on ones own highest self and highest potential then getting mixed up in comparisons.

As for evidence of DNA any DNA found on Earth by definition would not be declared "alien" due to the fact its found on Earth, put simply how would we know what arose naturally and what was created by Divine hand? Its impossible for us to prove it, all life on Earth shares common ancestry we are Gaia's children aswell as Zeus's. We are children of Earth AND Starry Heavens. The Gods likely worked with what was already present on Earth to create Humanity, there is also the notion of "convergent evolution" which I think Zevists should look into and IMO seems to be more a fact than a theory.