Other #77138 About women, is this true?

[AskSatanOperator]

It is just a quote I read, not my opinion.

"People who can't defend themselves physically (women and low T men) parse information through a consensus filter as a safety mechanism. They do not ask "is this true", they ask "will others be OK with me thinking this is true". Which makes them very malleable to brute force manufactured consensus. If every screen they look at says the same thing they will adopt that position because their brain interprets it as everyone in the tribe believing it. Only high T males and anuerotypical people are actually free to parse new information with an objective "is this true?" filter. This is why a Republic of high status males is best for decision making. Democratic, but a democracy only for those who are free to think".

Of course it's a huge generalisation, since HPS Maxine and others were literally the opposite of this. But I wanted to know is there a basis in the general nature of women which fascilitates this behaviour? Or is it something purely individual soul level?

 

[OttoHart]

One single chemical or hormone does not explain behavior to this degree, the matter is more complex.

To an extent, this can be true, unless other factors offset it. It is true that most people have this kind of mentality, but there are more reasons to it than "low testosterone". At the end of the day, genetics and your physical characteristics will reflect your repeated habit actions (right now, but also across generations or lifetimes), which started as thoughts, which started as energy.
The real issue with this statement is it does not touch upon core reasons why people act this way, which is at the thought level: having their thinking programmed. Instead, it uses a rather shoddy reason for this mentality, which as you pointed out, does not always apply.

 

[Symmachos-ZEUS/SHAITAN]

But I wanted to know is there a basis in the general nature of women which fascilitates this behaviour? Or is it something purely individual soul level?

Basically, it is useless to quote something without reporting the source. You may have gotten it from a neuroscience textbook recommended by a UNADE professor as much as from an amazon book “50 things to read while bored.” Basically, many mental processes are the result of social constructs and it is very common for such cultures to decide and think for us, which is why asking “what I think” is often encouraged.

Maybe you can get the wrong idea. In fact, it is possible for you to think wrongly. Never mind, ask yourself what you think. It is okay if you think wrong, because opinions and studies are continually subject to methods of revision and updating. So even if your opinion is completely fallacious, that's great; it's a starting point on which to build. No one is born with perfect opinions. Otherwise we wouldn't have created Galilean methods or classified cognitive bias. And even the study would stop making sense.

In any case, the social conformity bias does exist, just as one often seeks proof from a membership group reputed to be an authoritative source of approval of an idea of collective dominance. We are human beings; it is normal for this to happen. And testosterone has some effects regarding assertive and dominant states. But no, there are too many factors to consider regarding critical thinking that are purely cultural and personal education/training. The Testosterone parameter is poor.

 

[Proshat]

I don’t know why people act like voting rights were handed to women out of kindness. Women didn’t *ask*—they took it. Governments didn’t *give* them the vote; they were forced to surrender it. And if anyone tries to take that right away again, women will find a way to take it back. No country ‘allows’ equality—it’s taken, always.