AskSatanOperator
Well-known member
Let's say the Ascendent is in Libra but the 1st House is intercepted by Scorpio, and that Mercury is also in the sign of Scorpio but placed in the 2nd House instead.
Mars and Pluto can obviously be treated as co-ruler(s) due to the sign rulership, but what about Mercury being in the same sign as the intercepted 1st House, although it's actual position is in the 2nd House?
My question is: will it function similarly to a Mercury in the 1st House due to the Scorpio connection bridging the gap between the two adjacent Houses or not?
Also, can a very heavily aspected Mercury essentially be treated as "co-ruler" of sorts? Because presumably, this would mean there's a strong gravitational pull in this area due to the planetary alignment(s)?
What if the signs/houses ruled by Mercury are also heavily prominent, such as Uranus/Aquarius, Virgo, the 3rd House and possibly even Sagittarius as it relates to a sort of intellectualism?
Mars and Pluto can obviously be treated as co-ruler(s) due to the sign rulership, but what about Mercury being in the same sign as the intercepted 1st House, although it's actual position is in the 2nd House?
My question is: will it function similarly to a Mercury in the 1st House due to the Scorpio connection bridging the gap between the two adjacent Houses or not?
Also, can a very heavily aspected Mercury essentially be treated as "co-ruler" of sorts? Because presumably, this would mean there's a strong gravitational pull in this area due to the planetary alignment(s)?
What if the signs/houses ruled by Mercury are also heavily prominent, such as Uranus/Aquarius, Virgo, the 3rd House and possibly even Sagittarius as it relates to a sort of intellectualism?