What people usually refer to as "Authoritarianism" is actually a normal Government that has a direction, not actually "Authoritarianism" as they imagine it. Functional Government works on a minimal scale, affecting the lives of people positively but in a way that looks like it isn't really "there".
The reality is in inverse, even in the regimes they claim it was a dictatorship, people had more freedoms and personal autonomy. They were closer to actual democratic regimes. Regardless, too much confusion and lack of studying has many people saying things about "Authoritarianism", which are all false.
Even Hitler and Mussolini were elected by the people, ie, in a Democratic manner. The sense of that ruining yourself is "choice" also existed in these regimes, but it wasn't as popular to bag yourself and kill yourself.
It's also ironic how in most of these regimes, many rights violated today were actually upheld. That's because Governments like this take pride in the quality of life they attain for people, while many like the modern US, are drifting away from this.
The situation that leaving everything down the slide guarantees "Freedom" and that it's an "Egalitarian" thing to do so, is a lie. Today "Egalitarianism", is used as an empty shell to promote jewish ideologies, such as things that kill your Nation or equate you with invaders etc.
Societies that do this and let things just go into any direction, just collapse. A level of cohesion is needed for States or they don't survive. Any society that does this, loses all it's rights in due time.
Democracy can be very good, but it tends to be very bad since the masses of people make good choices sometimes and sometimes they can make terrible choices out of deception. Democracy would definitely work if there wasn't the enemy to constantly dig the grave of everyone, and is considered a good state of affairs.
Democracy in the form of "mob rule" and "we wuz equal n shiet" only in the end of the day creates discord. We haven't really seen proper democracy since the jews have been controlling all vectors of society, just a jewish two party control project.
Actual Democracy hasn't existed for quite sometime, and ceases to exist more and more as time goes. It existed in the Golden Age of Pericles, however, even this form would be considered "Authoritarian Dictatorship" by today's false "egalitarian" standards.
The best remains Aristocracy, which is a blend between egalitarian ideals and promotion of the best individuals. Even Democracy in the proper form is called "Polity", which has to do with election by the people, but of great individuals. So it's a blend between Aristocratic rule and Elections.
Monarchy [rule of 1 impressive person], Aristocracy [many advanced people] or "Polity" [a form where everyone involved is smart enough to make good choices, inapplicable at this level of development of humanity now, but it has happened in some historical intervals]. That is the good Aristotelian ideal.
The bad, is as follows: Tyranny [1 useless asshole that is a parasite and abuses everything pointlessly, see Geoffrey in Game of Thrones], Oligarchy [similar to present day Plutocracy where a few rich jews run everything with a couple of shills], or "Democracy" [a delusion that the people rule created by the above bad categories, or even worse, the actual mob rule that decides the worst of the worst because it has no given standards, commonly manipulated by the oligarchs].
Generally because most of humanity sucks [including many that are supposed the "Leaders" of it and too much jewish influence, we tend to find ourselves in the lower spectrum of corruption no matter what is applied:
Democracy as it is today, is mob rule and/or jewish rule that serves selected castes only. That's why you will see many people talk negative of it. "Democracy" ends up never serving the people in the end of the day, or the whole.
JoS isn't a State Government or something like that, so comparing what happens here to Governments is a wrong thing to do.
Regardless, the JoS promotes we move onto the higher spectrum of spirituality and self understanding for as many people as possible, and how this is going to manifest politically. The manifestations can change with times, technology, and other effects.
If it's going to be Monarchy or some form of Aristocracy, or a Polity/Republic, or even a similar form to Senatorial Roman rule, or whatever of the sort - is fine, so long the spiritual Sanatana Dharma where people and society lives and advances positively is intact. We are opposed against all the corrupted forms of unspiritual rulership such as these three listed above, all of which destroy the creation of the Gods when they are applied.
-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666
The reality is in inverse, even in the regimes they claim it was a dictatorship, people had more freedoms and personal autonomy. They were closer to actual democratic regimes. Regardless, too much confusion and lack of studying has many people saying things about "Authoritarianism", which are all false.
Even Hitler and Mussolini were elected by the people, ie, in a Democratic manner. The sense of that ruining yourself is "choice" also existed in these regimes, but it wasn't as popular to bag yourself and kill yourself.
It's also ironic how in most of these regimes, many rights violated today were actually upheld. That's because Governments like this take pride in the quality of life they attain for people, while many like the modern US, are drifting away from this.
The situation that leaving everything down the slide guarantees "Freedom" and that it's an "Egalitarian" thing to do so, is a lie. Today "Egalitarianism", is used as an empty shell to promote jewish ideologies, such as things that kill your Nation or equate you with invaders etc.
Societies that do this and let things just go into any direction, just collapse. A level of cohesion is needed for States or they don't survive. Any society that does this, loses all it's rights in due time.
Democracy can be very good, but it tends to be very bad since the masses of people make good choices sometimes and sometimes they can make terrible choices out of deception. Democracy would definitely work if there wasn't the enemy to constantly dig the grave of everyone, and is considered a good state of affairs.
Democracy in the form of "mob rule" and "we wuz equal n shiet" only in the end of the day creates discord. We haven't really seen proper democracy since the jews have been controlling all vectors of society, just a jewish two party control project.
Actual Democracy hasn't existed for quite sometime, and ceases to exist more and more as time goes. It existed in the Golden Age of Pericles, however, even this form would be considered "Authoritarian Dictatorship" by today's false "egalitarian" standards.
The best remains Aristocracy, which is a blend between egalitarian ideals and promotion of the best individuals. Even Democracy in the proper form is called "Polity", which has to do with election by the people, but of great individuals. So it's a blend between Aristocratic rule and Elections.
Monarchy [rule of 1 impressive person], Aristocracy [many advanced people] or "Polity" [a form where everyone involved is smart enough to make good choices, inapplicable at this level of development of humanity now, but it has happened in some historical intervals]. That is the good Aristotelian ideal.
The bad, is as follows: Tyranny [1 useless asshole that is a parasite and abuses everything pointlessly, see Geoffrey in Game of Thrones], Oligarchy [similar to present day Plutocracy where a few rich jews run everything with a couple of shills], or "Democracy" [a delusion that the people rule created by the above bad categories, or even worse, the actual mob rule that decides the worst of the worst because it has no given standards, commonly manipulated by the oligarchs].
Generally because most of humanity sucks [including many that are supposed the "Leaders" of it and too much jewish influence, we tend to find ourselves in the lower spectrum of corruption no matter what is applied:
Democracy as it is today, is mob rule and/or jewish rule that serves selected castes only. That's why you will see many people talk negative of it. "Democracy" ends up never serving the people in the end of the day, or the whole.
JoS isn't a State Government or something like that, so comparing what happens here to Governments is a wrong thing to do.
Regardless, the JoS promotes we move onto the higher spectrum of spirituality and self understanding for as many people as possible, and how this is going to manifest politically. The manifestations can change with times, technology, and other effects.
If it's going to be Monarchy or some form of Aristocracy, or a Polity/Republic, or even a similar form to Senatorial Roman rule, or whatever of the sort - is fine, so long the spiritual Sanatana Dharma where people and society lives and advances positively is intact. We are opposed against all the corrupted forms of unspiritual rulership such as these three listed above, all of which destroy the creation of the Gods when they are applied.
-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666
