Understanding a different outlook on pacifism

[DisillusionedCitizen]

Every community, especially ones that consist of empathic people, want peace, nonviolence and pacifism as they're the most sought out ideals in human history. Apparently, it has a strong basis in civilization. Pacifism, or non-violent activism, is a belief that war and violence should be condemned, and matters must be settled peacefully. Apparently, Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. were hailed as champions of nonviolent protest, using their voice; they speak with utmost conviction that love, compassion, and empathy would make tyrannical governments listen to the protesters message and have a change of heart. Unfortunately, pacifism and nonviolence, and more specifically, the perspective that people ascribe to, is not as effective as many people like to think. It's a socially great idea for people to go by on paper, but in practice, it only works when at least two parties are in agreement on a deal/treaty/declaration. It's not as (for lack of a better word) universal an ideal as people like to think.

A change of perspective must be in order: Eliminating the standard perspective of pacifism and nonviolence, a new, alternative, and admittedly more unorthodox view must be called into light, one that hasn't been explored before with a question: What if the opposition to violence and war is expressed not to bring peace and compassion, but lure communities into being oppressed and victimized instead? As far-fetched as this kind of view can be, it doesn't sound like something a pacifist would do... Unless they're the tyrant. How would a pacifistic person be a tyrant and oppress people if they don't fight themselves? The answer is obvious: Through lies, misdirection, laws that protect the pacifist, and (indirectly) drugs. When the pacifistic diplomat has more power over the people and choose to abuse it, they realize they can get away with any lie and and abuse of power as long as they say the right words to calm people down. This kind of pacifism makes other people drop their guards; a loose, pragmatic type of pacifism/nonviolent resistance, for lack of a better term. It's similar to fishermen using bait to catch a fish. Once upon a time, my father once talked to me and his friends about how barbaric fishing can be: you use a bait to catch fish, and the fish is attracted to the bait, lowering its guard. Once the fish is caught and reeled in, it could be killed and used for food. Thinking back to it back then, it's a great analogue that can be applied to empathic people. Hardworking people who are blindly empathic and compassionate tend to fall for this very often, and, because empathy and compassion are pushed more than necessary in the present day, they're little the wiser about it; they think they can solve everything peacefully, and pacifistic tyrants can simply spin everything about the information against them, claiming it to be a slander or a false report.

This pragmatic, unconventional outlook on pacifism is deceptive and unpredictable. No one else understands this viewpoint better than the Jew: The Jew knows they can't win in a direct fight, so they have to undermine the defense of victims. There's a question that has to be asked here: How is it that the Jews took down the Roman Empire after they were crushed militarily? My hypothesis is this: Through their claims that Christianity, and then Islam, is a "religion of peace." Because the Romans over-emphasized empathy and compassion and partially because they were rigid with the other part of reason owing to ignorance, a majority of the Roman officials took all the fictitious stories at face value, not realizing that these "teachings of nonviolence" from Christianity were meant to undermine Rome from within; Roman families had their guards dropped, allowing the Jews to conquer the Roman courts via infiltration and spying, then followed by laws (from banning meat to forbidding occult magic) that slowly weakened the Romans over time, ultimately leading to the collapse of the Roman Empire itself. Islam, however, doesn't claim to keep up the peace as long as Christianity does. The Jews partially repeated this application of pacifism into the present day.

 

[Karnonnos [JG]]

People should always think of war in a very grave manner and not just declare war for the sake of satiating bloodlust. The jews have internally 'declared war' on every other people they came across which is why they are loathed.

The jewish variation of pacifism when it isn't used for a greater kind of goal or collective sacrifice for the temporary good, or at least the sane view that war is ideally the last resort, is typically tied to resentment.

Due to their inability to express this urge physically, resentment is what jews have always thrived through in any society they infested, as the general evil and negative forces enveloping them are tied to this set of behaviors. They are also profound cowards and sneaky. They know intuitively how to foment any and all kinds of resentment in and exploit the laziness of goyim themselves, creating stasis and bickering. Sometimes this manifests as 'pacifism' and conscientious objection, other times it resembles the insane kinds of bloodthirsty jingoism we see with Russia and Ukraine.

The jewish view iterated in xianity and communism as well as contemporary 'intersectionality theory' is that the eagle soaring in the sky is 'evil' for being an eagle, opposed to a sewer dwelling rat, because the sewer dwelling rat is more numerous, more common and it suffers more, making each rat a peaceable victim compared to a 'killing machine' eagle.

The eagle when grounded is taught to believe that it is wrong for not being a rat and wrong for the violence sustaining its existence, even wrong for having talons, despite the salient fact is that an eagle's stage of development is far beyond that of a rat and less violent in reality.

With pacifism in practice, the picture can more complicated. A few intuitively did not want to fight against NS Germany for example. Some Indians refused to fight against Japan. The appropriate level of loyalty to one's folk, responsibilities of being a man and so on come into play here.

 

[Gearshift]

Don't forget spiritual warfare and damning people's mentality by burning down libraries like Alexandria or Nalanda University(3.5 months of burning of the material in Bharat[India's proper name]).

This is the superior way for Peace i.e. Qiballah(Ancient Egyptian for Peaceful but not pacifist or turn the other cheek). I think these people are like anti-racists you get a few shots of whiskey or get them piss drunk and they are the most racist people with utter disdain for even their own race. Sheer fact is these people think like this due to brainwashing violence and killing and blowing shit up is needed. Why do you think video games exist. The two sides of the same coin Svadisthana Warfare/Combat/Violence and Sex/Lust/Love/and everything in between positive, neutral, and negative sex. Sheer fact is these people have been turned into sheep and they probably shall get fucked in the ass like one.

What you see is what happens when powerlessness exist. "Powerlessness breeds evil" not just evil bad but uppitiness. These people are uppity motherfuckers who will feel the blade or bullet or if lucky the punch and kick of a person. Without ever fighting back, these people have been maligned into believing Humanities dark side is somehow bad. Satan and the Gods posses a dark side look at Apollo's information on JoS mainsite.

Apollo: [Azazel is also the deliverer of Justice. While he bestows many gifts to his disciples and people, he can be the exact reverse when it comes to the enemies of the Gods. He can bring very dark calamities,and as bright and beautiful he can be in his loving face, so dark and bleak can the curses he casts on his enemies be. The power of Apollo to curse was symbolized by his bow, with which he flung darts onto his enemies. Socrates in Plato’s work refers to this power as his power to “Cast Darts”, which can bring major damage to enemies. [18] Onthe contrary, Apollo is a strong protector for those of the Gods,averting evil from reaching them. [19]]

People have been stripped of power i.e. powerlessness and continue to vomit non-sense. I agree with Satan peaceable means. But that doesn't mean being a christcuck and turning around.

I'll leave this video here which I'm sure Abyssos is very familiar with.

Peace through Power!

 

[phi3.14infinity]

Exactly pacifism ,forgiveness ,non violence are some of the reasons which have encouraged weakness and not to fight for the right cause which creates defenseless weak society

 

[Havoc]

Look at wasreal right now, the jews will talk about peace and tolerance ending but as soon as they get the opportunity they’ll throw grenades that look like canned food at starving children. Peace talk is for cry bullies.

The Spartans were actually some of the greatest diplomats and scholars in Ancient Greece and vary conservative when deciding to use force, always advocating for peace and freedom of their fellow Greeks but when they went to war they almost never lost a ground battle. Most people only remember them for their fighting but Spartan attitude is an fine example of who to treat war

 

[Purified666]

Pacifism is against all sense and reason, and it's especially against laws of nature. Pacifism is yet another bullshit term invented by those who have slave morality in order to appear "noble" or "civilized", and not as a bunch of useless weaklings.

Being a pacifist means you have no power. And instead of working to gain power, you mask your weakness as some sort of personal choice. "I am against violence!" Yes, because you have no capability for it.

When one has power, they can wield it as they see fit. Father Satan is extremely powerful and yet He doesn't obliterate some low-life deluded subhuman scum that hates Him. He could. He has the power to erase that filth with a snap of His fingers, but chooses not to because it's beneath Him. That is power - being capable of great violence but choosing when and if to use it.

Peaceful means having power, pacifist means having no power.