Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

SS attitude toward circumcision?

Regarding circumcision, some males are born with a condition in which the foreskin is too tight (a condition known as phimosis), which can cause pain during erections or while attempting to masturbate. In such cases, undergoing circumcision at a mature age can be a beneficial solution to alleviate discomfort and enable a more pleasurable experience. However, a potential downside of the procedure is a reduction in sensitivity. That sensitivity loss can vary, with estimates ranging up to about 20-30%, though this depends on the individual.
 
Regarding circumcision, some males are born with a condition in which the foreskin is too tight (a condition known as phimosis), which can cause pain during erections or while attempting to masturbate. In such cases, undergoing circumcision at a mature age can be a beneficial solution to alleviate discomfort and enable a more pleasurable experience. However, a potential downside of the procedure is a reduction in sensitivity. That sensitivity loss can vary, with estimates ranging up to about 20-30%, though this depends on the individual.

This is a non-issue as the foreskin retracts by itself as the child grows up (at most by puberty), and even if it doesn't there are many ways to treat phimosis without circumcision:

 
This is a non-issue as the foreskin retracts by itself as the child grows up (at most by puberty), and even if it doesn't there are many ways to treat phimosis without circumcision:


Thank you for your input. It's true that at birth, the foreskin is usually fused to the glans (head of the penis) and cannot be retracted. This is completely normal and protective. The age at which the foreskin naturally becomes retractable varies widely though, as a significant number of males might not fully retract until adolescence. Forced retraction before natural separation, which can take years, can therefore cause pain, tearing, and scarring. Most pediatricians and urologists today advise that parents should not forcibly retract a child's foreskin, as this can lead to complications.

Phimosis, or the inability to retract the foreskin, is sometimes over-diagnosed in young boys, which can lead to unnecessary circumcisions. True phimosis usually refers to cases where the foreskin cannot be retracted due to scarring or other structural issues, which are generally rare. For most boys, non-retractability at a young age is normal, and not true phimosis.

My initial response was based on personal knowledge of people who needed circumcision due to severe discomfort and pain. For them, the "pseudo-diagnosis" wasn’t something that resolved with age or other methods; their symptoms persisted into adulthood and caused significant issues. In their cases, circumcision was the only viable option due to the medical nature of said problem.
 
Just a piece of information for anyone concerned: doctors aggressively push circumcision in the US claiming that it makes you healthier or cleaner, or as the only cure for phimosis (it's like a dentist claiming the only cure for tooth decay is to remove your teeth).

It's not about health or hygiene at all (because it's very dumb anyway, it's like saying that removing all your teeth makes you healthier and cleaner because you can't get tooth decay and you don't need to brush your teeth), it's because the foreskins of circumcised babies are used in the cosmetics industry for big $$$. It's a jewish scam, very typical:


The industry has recently gone a step further, developing skin care creams made from the foreskin of babies. Yes, the act of mutilating baby’s genitals has become a profitable business for cosmetic companies, who are able to grow almost $100,000 worth of fibroblasts from a single foreskin.

Oprah has came out and endorsed the foreskin lotion on her show and website, calling it a “miracle cream”. As a result of Oprah’s endorsement and potentially false claims about the lotion, SkinMedica reaped enormous profit, and now millions of women around the world are smearing cream made from the foreskin of babies all over their faces.
 
Genital mutilation, this specific form is Jewish in origin. No need to remove parts of a baby boys genital for no reason, if cleaning is an issue then just teach him to wash properly.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top