Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Question #3828: Templars?

AskSatanOperator

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 16, 2022
Messages
5,656
Location
[email protected]
are they satanists? was jacques de molay a high priest of ss? what did they find in the desert/middle east?
 
are they satanists? was jacques de molay a high priest of ss? what did they find in the desert/middle east?
The answer to the question:

Yes, the Templars were Satanists, I would say they were the SS of that time, namely the Templars of Jacques de Molay, who existed at that time until the Templar Order was actually destroyed by the Vatican.

During the excavations in the East, the Templar Order found pagan relics and documents that the Vatican sought to destroy, relics and documents could convince the Aristocracy of Europe (Monarchs who ruled countries, armies and peasants) to return to paganism, create an alliance under the rule of the Templar Order and destroy Christianity (in the West) along with Islam (in the East).

Geopolitically, the Templar Order controlled the entire banking sector and actually invented it, through the banking system the Templar Order controlled the financial system, the main trading currency (between Kingdoms (Aristocrats), not peasants) was pure gold, as historians confirm, the Templars were preparing a project to create a United Europe under the rule of the Templar Order by analogy with the United States of Europe which were later offered to European countries by the first founding father of the United States, the true Mason and Satanist George Washington.

My opinion:

I think the Templars wanted to end the Vatican, because taking over the Vatican would deprive Jews of power and provide access to pagan documents stolen by Vatican Jews, including religious, historical and legal documents stating that Paganism and Satanism (Spiritual Satanism) is the true religion, and Christianity never existed.

Excerpts from documents exposing Christianity could be published in European countries by decree of European monarchs, who, after the destruction of the Vatican, would adopt a New religion - Paganism and Satanism (Spiritual Satanism) and showed the truth to their peasants and soldiers (ordinary people).

Further, under the banners of the Templar Order, together with the armies of European monarchs, it was possible to boldly organize a new crusade against Byzantium (Orthodox Christianity) and the Turks (Islamists), or choose another Geopolitical scenario that would also be beneficial to the Templar Order and the peoples of Europe.

Also, the then SS was actually the Teutonic Order, which carried out its activities on a smaller scale and defended the interests of Germans and Slavs, like Nazi Germany.

Historical fact:

Throughout its existence, the Teutonic Order and other German countries legally concluded political, military and trade alliances with individual Slavic countries, all legal documents have been preserved and are kept in museums in Germany, in Russia this information is carefully hidden and hushed up.

A historical example of an alliance between Germans and Slavs:

An example of such an alliance is the Hanseatic League, of which the Teutonic Order was also a member on a par with other Slavic kingdoms.

The main languages of the Hanseatic League were two languages:
1. Middle Low German (German: Mittelniederdeutsch);
2. The Old Russian language.

The league provided much-needed protection for its members not only from hostile political rivals but from robbery by thieves on land or at sea.

The league was powerful enough to challenge the social structure by establishing Kontors (counting houses or offices) in cities ranging from Bruges to London to Novgorod and beyond; all of which brought them incredible wealth.

"The most outstanding group of independent communes were the German Baltic commercial cities that made up the Hanseatic League. The north German merchants not only engaged in far-flung trade stretching from Russia to England, but they formed political and military alliances and fought Scandinavian kings for hegemony in the Baltic. (471-472)" Source: Cantor, N. F. The Civilization of the Middle Ages. Harper Perennial, 1994.

map.png

A map illustrating the expanse and complexity of the northern Europen trade network of commerce and the powerful association of cities and merchant guilds known as the Hanseatic League (from Old High German - Hanse for “guild,” or “association,” most probably based on a Gothic word for “company, troop”).

At its height, the League numbered more than 200 cities across Northern Europe and maintained a trade monopoly along the coasts of the Baltic and the North Seas, from present-day Russia in the east to England and Scotland in the west.
 
The Templars and many similar organizations were mostly christian but had occult circles in which many high ranking members were occult satanists.
 
The Templars and many similar organizations were mostly christian but had occult circles in which many high ranking members were occult satanists.
An interesting point of view, but I believe that the Templars were not a christian organization and all the monarchs of that time knew this very well, of course they could tell the peasants something else (allegedly profess christianity), but no one took into account the opinion of the peasants.

If you look at the structures of many chivalric orders and their symbols of that time, even crosses, then as a rule there is nothing christian about them.

The crosses depicted on the symbols of the Templar Order and the Teutonic Order (as well as many others knightly orders, of course not all knightly orders) are pagan symbols that are depicted on many sigils of Demons.

If you look at the rituals of the Teutonic Order, which HPS Maxine referred to in old sermons, then are purely pagan rituals.

In the European kingdoms, too, everything was not so clear.

If we take the European kingdoms, for example, the Slavic kingdoms (Grand Duchy of Lithuania), then up to the reign of King Jagiello, the Grand Dukes of Lithuania adhered to paganism, for example, King Mindovg.

According to the Gustyn Chronicle, in 1246 in Novogrudok he converted to orthodox christianity, guided exclusively by political considerations, which were based on his desire to rule in the Old Russian Novogrudok.

After Mindovg's rival, Lithuanian Prince Tovtivill, who was sitting in Polotsk, arrived in Riga and converted to catholicism there, frightened by the threat posed by the Livonian Order, Mindovg also converted to Catholicism in 1252.

With the weakening of the threat from the Germans, in 1260 he returned to paganism, which he had never actually left, from the moment he returned to paganism, he entered into a serious conflict with the Vatican, but at that moment his kingdom expanded, as the territories where pagans lived voluntarily decided to join him.
 
An interesting point of view, but I believe that the Templars were not a christian organization and all the monarchs of that time knew this very well, of course they could tell the peasants something else (allegedly profess christianity), but no one took into account the opinion of the peasants.

If you look at the structures of many chivalric orders and their symbols of that time, even crosses, then as a rule there is nothing christian about them.

The crosses depicted on the symbols of the Templar Order and the Teutonic Order (as well as many others knightly orders, of course not all knightly orders) are pagan symbols that are depicted on many sigils of Demons.

If you look at the rituals of the Teutonic Order, which HPS Maxine referred to in old sermons, then are purely pagan rituals.

In the European kingdoms, too, everything was not so clear.

If we take the European kingdoms, for example, the Slavic kingdoms (Grand Duchy of Lithuania), then up to the reign of King Jagiello, the Grand Dukes of Lithuania adhered to paganism, for example, King Mindovg.

According to the Gustyn Chronicle, in 1246 in Novogrudok he converted to orthodox christianity, guided exclusively by political considerations, which were based on his desire to rule in the Old Russian Novogrudok.

After Mindovg's rival, Lithuanian Prince Tovtivill, who was sitting in Polotsk, arrived in Riga and converted to catholicism there, frightened by the threat posed by the Livonian Order, Mindovg also converted to Catholicism in 1252.

With the weakening of the threat from the Germans, in 1260 he returned to paganism, which he had never actually left, from the moment he returned to paganism, he entered into a serious conflict with the Vatican, but at that moment his kingdom expanded, as the territories where pagans lived voluntarily decided to join him.
As I understand the Teutonic order was mostly Christian and only a small group of members were occult Satanists, that's why the grand duke of Lithuania Vytautas and his cousin Jagellius who were pagans were enemies of the Teutonic order, because the Teutonic order was pushing the Christianization of Lithuania under the orders of the Vatican and its grand master at that time Ulrich von Jungingen was a puppet of the Vatican, on the contrary Sigismund of Hungary who was a Satanist refused to help the Teutonic order in the crusade against pagan Lithuania.
 
As I understand the Teutonic order was mostly Christian and only a small group of members were occult Satanists, that's why the grand duke of Lithuania Vytautas and his cousin Jagellius who were pagans were enemies of the Teutonic order, because the Teutonic order was pushing the Christianization of Lithuania under the orders of the Vatican and its grand master at that time Ulrich von Jungingen was a puppet of the Vatican, on the contrary Sigismund of Hungary who was a Satanist refused to help the Teutonic order in the crusade against pagan Lithuania.
It is possible that you are right in a separate historical period (which you mentioned), when a traitor or a spy could come to power in the Teutonic Order, but I think not, because there is historical evidence that suggests that the Teutonic Order stubbornly refused to participate in the Crusades in Arab countries, constantly thinking up various excuses and convincing the Vatican that they were fighting pagans in Slavic lands, but historians say that it was only an excuse so that the Vatican would not involve the Teutonic Order in the Crusades, the Teutons had been doing this for several centuries.

In order to understand this, I think it will be necessary to carefully study this particular historical period, based on historical documents regarding the motives of the decisions taken.

I think that both the Teutonic Order and Lithuania waged border territorial wars between themselves, Teutonic Order decided to use this situation to seize territories and resources, because at that time during the cruel period, the pagans were not united and fought among themselves for resources (human (peasants), territorial (agricultural lands and cities) and others, taking into account, that during these periods there were severe crop failures, the little Ice Age (very severe winters), plague and other infections, not counting the expansion of the Turks, which approached both the borders of the Teutonic Order and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.

In any case, all these wars that took place between the kingdoms were not beneficial to either Lithuania or the Teutonic Order, but were beneficial to the Vatican (Jews), at that time there was a strong influence of the Jesuits in all the kingdoms, who wove intrigues and conspiracies, killed representatives of the Aristocracy, who according to the Jews of the Vatican, posed a threat to the Vatican (Jews).

I think the aristocracy of the Teutonic Order deceived the Vatican, leading them by the nose for several centuries, since the Teutonic Order pursued its own interests exclusively at that time In the struggle for survival.
 
As I understand the Teutonic order was mostly Christian and only a small group of members were occult Satanists, that's why the grand duke of Lithuania Vytautas and his cousin Jagellius who were pagans were enemies of the Teutonic order, because the Teutonic order was pushing the Christianization of Lithuania under the orders of the Vatican and its grand master at that time Ulrich von Jungingen was a puppet of the Vatican, on the contrary Sigismund of Hungary who was a Satanist refused to help the Teutonic order in the crusade against pagan Lithuania.
The Teutonic Order was not seen in the genocide of pagans, because it was pagan itself.

The Teutonic Order actively resisted the Vatican and did not participate in the Crusades in Arab countries, motivating this by the fact that it allegedly waged war with pagans in Eastern Europe, but at the same time the Teutonic Order waged wars as well as Lithuania, was not noticed in any special cruelty, atrocities or genocide.

The Teutonic Order tried not to deal with the Vatican, but to solve its territorial (border) problems.

The Teutonic Order didn't benefit from the defeat of the pagan states, because then the Vatican would have forced the Teutonic Order to participate in the crusades in Arab countries, which the Teutonic Order avoided with all its might.
 
The Teutonic Order was not seen in the genocide of pagans, because it was pagan itself.

The Teutonic Order actively resisted the Vatican and did not participate in the Crusades in Arab countries, motivating this by the fact that it allegedly waged war with pagans in Eastern Europe, but at the same time the Teutonic Order waged wars as well as Lithuania, was not noticed in any special cruelty, atrocities or genocide.

The Teutonic Order tried not to deal with the Vatican, but to solve its territorial (border) problems.

The Teutonic Order didn't benefit from the defeat of the pagan states, because then the Vatican would have forced the Teutonic Order to participate in the crusades in Arab countries, which the Teutonic Order avoided with all its might.
What you say also sounds coherent in some aspects, history is so corrupted that it is very difficult to filter everything.
2 centuries before the defeat of the Teutonic order by Lithuania and Poland there was another grand master of that order Hermann von Salza who I think was an occult Satanist, besides he was a close friend of the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II who was openly anti-Christian.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top