Orwell delayed, Tesla not accepting Bitcoin due to enviormental concerns.

[Specter]

Elon Musk just made a tweet stating Tesla will suspend crypto currency transactions involving their vehicles due to environmental concerns. Seams like Orwell is going to be delayed for awhile.

While I feel bad for anyone heavily invested in crypto right now, Elon does make sense here. It has always been known that Bitcoin mining requires an extensive amount of electricity, much of which is not produced with clean energy.

A truly environmentally friendly digital currency age cannot happen without an initial revolution in the energy sector, that is the SOLAR ENERGY revolution which the kikes have been suppressing for decades. I can only see crypto currency achieving its full potential when solar energy can be utilized for efficient crypto mining. In turn, this will impact the prices of Silver that are used in the manufacturing of solar panels, which are made into a paste in the solar photovoltaic cells that collects the electrons generated when the sunlight hits the panel. Because of silver’s high conductivity, it maximally converts sunlight into electricity.

Precious metals have always been our blue chip.

 

[Seby]

The astronauts that first got to the moon were displeased with Elon's project for commercial space travel. The fact is that they saw UFOs in space and don't want the truth to be revealed. Sad to see that even Neil Armstrong is against this, and he isn't under the spell of xianity.

 

[MrIntrepid]

Elon Musk just made a tweet stating Tesla will suspend crypto currency transactions involving their vehicles due to environmental concerns. Seams like Orwell is going to be delayed for awhile.

While I feel bad for anyone heavily invested in crypto right now, Elon does make sense here. It has always been known that Bitcoin mining requires an extensive amount of electricity, much of which is not produced with clean energy.

A truly environmentally friendly digital currency age cannot happen without an initial revolution in the energy sector, that is the SOLAR ENERGY revolution which the kikes have been suppressing for decades. I can only see crypto currency achieving its full potential when solar energy can be utilized for efficient crypto mining. In turn, this will impact the prices of Silver that are used in the manufacturing of solar panels, which are made into a paste in the solar photovoltaic cells that collects the electrons generated when the sunlight hits the panel. Because of silver’s high conductivity, it maximally converts sunlight into electricity.

Precious metals have always been our blue chip.

Elon is just another globalist puppet doing globalist puppet things. When he said this Bitcoin immediately took a huge hit and he definitely knew this would happen because he did the same thing with Dogecoin recently.

Tesla isn't eco friendly. His rockets aren't ego friendly. His ego isn't eco friendly. Guy needs to put himself into orbit and save the rest of us the oxygen.

And he can take his World Economic Forum guideline conforming self driving cars which are meant to confine everyone to jew watched "smart cities" with him too.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/04/19/tesla-texas-driverless-crash/


Just before midnight Saturday, a Tesla drove swiftly around a curve, veered off the road, struck a tree and burst into flames in The Woodlands, Tex., a suburb north of Houston, police said.

It took four hours for fire officials to put out the flames. Inside the 2019 Model S, police said, they found two passengers dead — and discovered that neither was driving the Tesla at the time of the crash.

“Our investigation has determined that one of the victims was in the front passenger seat; one was in the back seat,” Mark Herman, a constable for Harris County Precinct 4, told KHOU, adding police were “100 percent certain that no one was in the driver’s seat.”

Tesla has pushed ahead with technology it terms self-driving, increasing the driver assistance capabilities in some of its cars last fall despite criticism from some safety regulators who questioned whether the technology had been sufficiently tested. Tesla CEO Elon Musk said in a tweet Monday that data recovered “so far” indicated the car’s Autopilot function was not enabled, and the owner did not purchase the most advanced driver assistance suite that Tesla calls “Full Self-Driving.”

That disclosure, which came independent of federal investigators, raised new questions in the crash, including how much data Tesla had been able to recoup and whether it had been independently reviewed at the time of Musk’s statement. The National Transportation Safety Board, which sent two investigators to Texas to probe the crash, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The NTSB said it would look into the vehicle’s “operation” and the fire after the crash. It was unclear whether Musk’s disclosure about Autopilot was authorized by federal investigators.

In a previous case, however, the NTSB booted Tesla as a party to its probe into a fatal crash in California after the company released investigative findings ahead of the federal authorities.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration also said it was investigating Saturday’s crash. Altogether, the safety body has initiated 28 investigations into Tesla crashes, a spokeswoman said.

Although some Tesla vehicles can steer, accelerate and brake on their own in certain circumstances, drivers are still required to supervise and be ready to intervene. But as the autopilot features have become more common, some distracted drivers have been in crashes as their cars navigate on their own.

The driver of a 2017 Tesla model X SUV died after he crashed on Highway 101 in Mountain View, Calif., in March 2018. In the minutes leading up to the collision, the driver had been accessing a video game on his phone. Another driver died in a 2016 crash in Williston, Fla., after a tractor-trailer pulled out in front of the Tesla. The car’s autopilot feature failed to brake because it did not register the truck’s white side against a brightly lit sky. Investigators concluded the driver should have had an opportunity to brake before the collision, but was probably distracted. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found no faults with the Tesla’s autopilot software.

Officials haven’t confirmed that the passengers who died on Saturday were using Autopilot. The New York Times reported their wives had heard them discussing that feature before leaving that night.

Saturday’s crash also highlighted another concern about the electric cars that has been on regulators’ radar in recent years: hard-to-extinguish fires.

Officials in Houston said the battery inside Tesla ignited after the collision, causing a fire that burned for four hours and required more than 30,000 gallons of water to put out.

“Our office has never experienced a crash scene like this,” Herman told KHOU. “Normally, when the fire department arrives, they have a vehicle fire under control in minutes, but this went on for hours.”

Video footage from the crash scene captured by KHOU showed the vehicle’s smoldering frame, with nearly all of its exterior and interior structures destroyed by the fire.

The National Transportation Safety Board last year published an independent review of the risk of fires caused by the lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles. The board found that if a collision damages a battery, there is a risk of “uncontrolled increases in temperature and pressure, known as thermal runaway, which can lead to venting and combustion of toxic gases, cell rupture and release of projectiles, and battery reignition/fire.”

Regulators reviewed fires caused by the batteries in several Tesla vehicles, according to an NTSB report.

In 2017, a driver lost control of a 2016 Tesla model X SUV and crashed into the garage of a house, according to the report. The battery caught fire, which spread to the building. About 45 minutes after firefighters put the initial flames out, the battery flared up again in a “'blowtorch' manner” and it took several hours to quell the fire enough to move the vehicle.

A 2014 Tesla model S burned for more than an hour after crashing in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., on May 8, 2018. Firefighters struggled to put the flames out as the battery continued to smolder, even after hundreds of gallons of water had been sprayed onto the blaze. Two people died in the crash and a third passenger was seriously injured.

In June 2018, in West Hollywood, Calif., a 2012 Tesla model S appeared to spontaneously catch fire as it was being driven, according to the report. No one was injured in that incident.

The report also noted that the batteries used in electric vehicles designed by different companies also carried a risk of fire.

Tesla did not immediately return a request for comment late Sunday on the crash in Texas. Musk tweeted about the safety of the company’s autopilot features Saturday afternoon.

“Tesla with Autopilot engaged now approaching 10 times lower chance of accident than average vehicle,” he said, while also sharing a link to the company’s most recent safety report.

According to that report, Tesla’s car batteries are designed to prevent fires following collisions.

“n the extremely unlikely event that a fire occurs, the state-of-the-art design of our battery packs ensures that its safety system works as intended and isolates a fire to select areas within the battery while simultaneously venting heat away from the passenger cabin and the vehicle,” the report said.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

That is not at all what this was about.

Tesla accepted bitcoin as payment for their cars. They recieved a lot of bitcoin.

And now when bitcoin is getting more popular, many people are projecting that a bitcoin will reach 1 Million dollars. For this reason, Tesla will not give away any bitcoins, they are keeping and saving all of the ones that they have. This is what they mean by they will not trade them anymore, they are not going to give any of their bitcoins to anyone else.

 

[SigTyr]

Looks like a plain manipulation of the exchange market to me.
Are his car batteries produced in environment friendly way?

 

[One Wire Phenomenon]

From the bark to the tree.They stole the name Tesla.

 

[Sunny]

Yes, solar power is a great source of energy but I would point to a more advanced technique than photosynthesis to harvest energy. It is, however, more advanced than fuel-based noria.

Many scientists in the world have studied and thought about using hydrogen as a clean fuel but with our current level of technological development, this option is expensive and dangerous. In fact, it is necessary to keep hydrogen in -270 C° to keep it in liquid state and it is anyway unstable and creates pressure in the container and consequently it needs a gas release system and so leakage, probably it needs some other condition besides low temperature to stabilize it further. Carbon is easier to manipulate and handle as a fuel, both on its own and hydrocarbons.

I am referring to the separation of hydrogen from oxygen and then from water and the subsequent union of hydrogen with oxygen and then combustion with emission of steam or water. This technique is clean but besides being dangerous and expensive, there is another important aspect that scientists have not analyzed and solved.

To wit: If we use this technique en masse, large amounts of oxygen will be released into the atmosphere from the separation of hydrogen from water. Perhaps there will be no major health consequences but the question is; How much oxygen in a gaseous state will our planet be able to hold in the atmosphere? If we lose oxygen, it means we will lose water plus other atmospheric complications. We are discovering and learning and mistakes are inevitable but it is very important to learn from mistakes and not repeat them.

Another problem that should not be underestimated is the loss of matter with nuclear destruction of hydrogen, uranium, plutonium, etc. devices. I now understand what HPS Maxine meant by what he said about nuclear bombs, that matter is destroyed multiple times. Surely HPS Maxine meant that matter in nukes is destroyed deeper in its structure. In nuclear bombs there is a destruction of a deeper level, atoms are destroyed and with our current level of development, we cannot recover and reconstruct a matter destroyed at this level. When we are more advanced, we will be more capable and stronger but the fact is that creation and construction is much more difficult than destruction. You can't destroy a house with a match but building it is much more difficult.

A major long-term loss of matter would be the use of nuclear devices to heat water in nuclear thermal power plants. We must not destroy neither light nor heavy elements because such a life is destined to end and it is not the end that we want but infinity and eternity. One of the key things of eternity is undoubtedly the cycle.

Another very important and interesting thing I've noticed is that in order to advance infinitely, you need to advance infinitely in both the macrocosm and the microcosm.

 

[Hp. Hoodedcobra666]

Bitcoin is definitely the reverse of Orwell. Bitcoin allows, unlike jewish banks, free universal transference of monetary power, worldwide, throughout the globe. It cannot be controlled, stopped, or seized.

Not that long ago, Zuccerberg, another Jewish Globalist, did put a picture of two goats in his Facebook post, naming one Goat "BITCOIN" and another goat "MAX".

Now, for the unknowing people, this may look like a joke.

This, for the stupid masses, would mean that "Zuccerberg is going into Bitcoin!". However, this clearly means, Jews are doing rituals and mass sacrifices to attack the Bitcoin structure and cryptocurrency space, both with financial attacks, and also, jewish rituals. What Zuccerberg meant with this, is for his jewish friends to start doing massive curse rituals against Bitcoin, probably with the deliberate sacrifice of goats.

The same thing is the ritual they do towards Azazel on Yom Kippur.

However, for those who know the aspects of jewish rituals, these goats were probably named Bitcoin and Max, meaning, a maximum attack on Bitcoin [the Goat]. This is just a Jewish Ritual on the behalf of the Globalists. Of course, Elon Musk joined in after with his false and unsubstantiated attacks on Bitcoin.

The above is also related to the jewish sacrifices of Yom Kippur. A few days later, Musk of course, attacked Bitcoin with the lies that Bitcoin is "unsustainable" while in reality, Bitcoin in the next few years, will become definitely sustainable and is LARGELY sustainable.

This is just Elon trying to crash Bitcoin in order for him to buy it at a lower price [effectively the price tanked by 10%], and additionally, the enemy wants to promote a centralized CBDC future, where they have ultimate control.

This is an attempt for them to accelerate Orwell by attacking Bitcoin and a last ditch attempt of Jews to attack Decentralized Finance which will they perceive is the end of their financial centralized authority and jewish banking dynasty.

Elon's creations, brainchips, and everything else he does, is a major threat on the environment. He is also a financial markets manipulator of the highest calliber, and promotes the most stupid and worthless investment ie, Dogecoin, because he is a big shareholder to this, and expects to make billions of profits from it, unlike Bitcoin, in which other people hold bigger shares in than he does.

 

[Gearshift]

A truly environmentally friendly digital currency age cannot happen without an initial revolution in the energy sector, that is the SOLAR ENERGY revolution which the kikes have been suppressing for decades.

Just because Solar Power exists and just because there is "SOME" suppression of Solar technologies. Still does not make Solar power good. Perhaps for a small household whereby in a sunny place lots of energy can be made from it. To the point whereby even the power companies have to pay the family money for generating electricity to the grid, is nice and all. There are benefits to Solar but Solar is still not good and will never be good.

The energy revolution is actually Free-Energy Solutions. For example Mercury engines, Tesla Solid-State generators, I believe I'm getting the name wrong but Dr.Martin's Free-Energy Genny.

I believe the guy's name is Dr.Martin on the former JoSministries forum, former mageson discussed that a person back in the 20s maybe 30s potentially the name may have been Dr. Martins built a small reactor 3 almost 4 feet tall and it looked rectangular like a box. Apparently according to this person the generator could generate something like 130-150 Kilowatts of power for such a small device the possibility of scaling up is huge. Well funny enough the person states if you take this metal plate cast it out of higher quality, higher grade metal and put it back you get an instant 30-40 Kilowatts of power more so the device at that size and that primitive could already generate nearly 200 kilowatts.

There's a whole host of Free-Energy entrepreneurs who developed free-energy devices even under the thumb of kosher supervision. Whereby free-energy is seen as psuedo-science or laughable or violations of the Universe or simply outright "Oy gevalt my shekelberging activities, goyim you can't have free-energy. We can't berg and stein your shekels with free-energy devices".

I hope in the future when kosher supervision is broken that free-energy devices are seen seriously and are serious. Not just for anti-gravity and flying a vimana but for powering everything.

Same with Plasma batteries. Despite the fact Mercury batteries do something similar. It's been mentioned Plasma batteries once charged pretty much retain their charge until entropy. Basically a plasma battery could hold for lifetimes a charge. Decades, centuries, millenias, tens of millenias ,hundreds of millenias. I would not be surprised if someone states a plasma battery works till it's hit entropy and is falling apart and needs to be replaced with a brand new plasma cell.

Free-energy device/reactor/genny + plasma battery = nearly if not outright a never ending supply of energy.

Also because some people have taken spectrographical analysis of the pyramids at Giza and discovered EMF(Electro-motive forces) or Electro-magnetic frequencies. It's very possible that the kaballah pump sites produce free-energy a mild amount nothing serious just to provide cranking amps to turn over free-energy devices.

Think of it like a smartphone. If you built the phone from the beginning and do not charge the battery how can you turn the phone on. Well it's the same story here if a free-energy reactor needs to be cranked. To work how are you gonna make it work if it does not possess any electricity or electrical charge to turn over. Unless of course theorycrafting because the Universe is basically filled with electricity maybe the free energy device once built already has the cranking amps to turn over and charge mercury and or plasma cells.

Chicken and the egg scenario which came first the chicken or the egg.

Again it's a real interesting discussion how does a free-energy generator turn over. Is it simply built and it procures electricity from the environment to turn over or maybe the mercury and or plasma battery simply need the cranking amp charges to turn the generator on and the generator once on charges the mercury and or plasma battery to max and then never runs out.

Basically my theory is how do we make a free-energy device work if we do not possess electricity. Cause if history explains the present and future. Someone is gonna go out on a limb and create a free-energy device and then ask. IF I possess no electricity and I'm in the past how would I go about turning on the free-energy genny from a electrically-non-existing society.

Again the question is more of a IF you build it as a primitive society how would you go about turning over and making the device work.

The other question that needs to be asked is how do we make electricity do one of two things. Be 100% energy efficient, in other words if we need to deep dive electricity to realize that miliwatts, microwatts, nanowatts, picowatts etc.etc. have their uses even the most infinitesimal amount of electricity can power a device. Then the question becomes how do we utilize electricity to the max, massively reduce our electrical usage and electrical waste(i.e. heat) heat = inefficiency of electricity. Then the question becomes how do we build devices to use electricity perfectly at 100% and on top of that only be as temperature wise the temp of the environment. For example laptops are very inefficient many state the most consistent statement of heat is I can feel the heat of the HDD/SSD, I can feel the heat of the laptop components through the keyboard, and when I use the laptop long enough and turn it off for the day the heat is still there even 10-15 minutes later i.e. there is a cooldown phase.

The second thing that needs to be studied is how do we make the electricity move at instantaneous transmission with no transmission time in between. If you study quantum physics scientist over the last few years have discovered that quantum mechanics aren't instant rather they can be measured. For example with some quantum leaps they can occur in the microsecond region of time even up to 100 microsecond which is fairly within our grasp of studying electronics. Well funny enough how do we skip over all those slow speeds and harness electricity to be instantaneous with no transmission time in between.

For example electricity travels at the nanosecond period of time in electronics(about 50% the speed of light to about 90% so even a high-end, high-quality device can never reach 100% speed of light). Even if a powersupply is turned on both being connected to the socket and having it's rocker switch flipped to on. Even if you press the powerbutton 9/10 the computer doesn't turn you should still wait a solid second or two for the powersupply to supply power. So even electricity something that has been the most vital component of modern life. Is still not fast enough even major factories when turned off or constructed an are activated still require several seconds to feed the cranking amps to turn over electrical devices. Even a major factory still requires a solid few seconds to get electricity all over the rooms to initiate a start up.

So in essence the past, present, and future should have been free-energy. Now obviously you can't use a mercury engine as a generator cause it produces anti-gravity. Another possibility is anti-gravity is produced from certain powered devices but is not the main property of the mercury engine. In other words what produces anti-gravity the mercury engine itself i.e. pressurized 250,000 PSI mercury discs that are probably in a transmutation phase of becoming or tinging into red mercury. Would not be surprised if someone mentions as long as you transmute mercury to plasma it'll transmute into red mercury.

Or is there a specific component that generates the anti-gravity. Same with the Taurus field or Earth field. If outerspace travel requires the Taurus field to survive the background of space avoiding it on the planet due to it's field eliminating outerspace hazards of background. Then what generates the Taurus field, the mercury engine itself or a device that generates that field.

And then the question becomes if both anti-gravity and Taurus field are generated from devices powered by the mercury engine. Then how it gets further into how big or how powerful or how much electricity.

But even then comes another issue miniaturization. For electronic devices and really an all question. If batteries such as mercury or plasma require a charge and they can maintain their charge and deliver power for a long time. IS the engine/genny shut down. Or is the engine/genny kept on all the time.

If a free-energy electric car can run almost non-stop with a plasma battery does that mean that the free-energy generator i.e. the engine is kept off until a charging phase is done automatically or manually. OR does the engine/genny need to be on all the time no matter what.

Do we need to provide the genny/engine all the time power or does the fact we use batteries only a charge is needed once in a few lifetimes and the device is turned off kept as backup. In other words when does the main generator become simply a backup powersupplier. I'd wager to state this is more of a electronics question.

IF a laptop has a battery and can be charged wired and or wirelessly. Then at what point do we define the main energy grid in current times as simply a backup for charging devices. Does the battery promote free-energy or does it simply relegate free-energy aside and dominates everything.

If we were developing our civilization with free-energy devices. Either we build devices with a continuous power supply of a F-E genny/engine and later add batteries which begs the question can we keep the powersupplier off and run off batteries and top off manually when the charges go down. Or automatically with electronics revolution. Or is it a combination of both we use both the genny and batteries to supply power no matter what.

The real past, present, and future that our Gods wanted us is free-energy devices. I'm sure the Gods studied solar power and maybe as a school of thought they study it in case they need to use it as a frame of reference. But if the Gods made us skip all these renewable and non-renewable energies for simply free-energy. Then I'd wager to state it makes any other source of electrical output completely and utterly pointless. Same with transmission if many free-energy devices work on either wireless transmission or electronic circuitry(100% energy efficient and instantaneous transmission with no transmission time in between) for say an electronic CPB(Crystalline printed board) i.e. maintain electrical demand in a non-wireless state but rather through the circuitry. Then it's pointless for anything else.

One of the reason the enemy keeps power demands low. If everyone had what the Gods have then we'd save time, money, and effort.

 

[Specter]

The astronauts that first got to the moon were displeased with Elon's project for commercial space travel. The fact is that they saw UFOs in space and don't want the truth to be revealed. Sad to see that even Neil Armstrong is against this, and he isn't under the spell of xianity.

I saw a documentary on that, with unreleased voice chatter referring to them as "Santa Claus" lol. There's also speculation on whether they're allied beings or not.

Tesla isn't eco friendly. His rockets aren't ego friendly. His ego isn't eco friendly. Guy needs to put himself into orbit and save the rest of us the oxygen.

Facts,

That is not at all what this was about.

Tesla accepted bitcoin as payment for their cars. They recieved a lot of bitcoin.

And now when bitcoin is getting more popular, many people are projecting that a bitcoin will reach 1 Million dollars. For this reason, Tesla will not give away any bitcoins, they are keeping and saving all of the ones that they have. This is what they mean by they will not trade them anymore, they are not going to give any of their bitcoins to anyone else.

Ah, this makes a perfect cover up then.

Bitcoin is definitely the reverse of Orwell. Bitcoin allows, unlike jewish banks, free universal transference of monetary power, worldwide, throughout the globe.

My transfer fees say otherwise unfortunately

I like the concept as a currency but I dislike the energy costs to bring these into circulation. Bitcoin mining is very demanding to the electricity bill, and most electricity is sourced from non-renewable energy (which make up 85% of worldwide energy usage). As the price for crypto goes higher, so will mining, and with the way things are in the energy sector the environment will take a toll unless it principally transitions into renewable energy sources.

I got into mining a few days ago and made around $3 in one day. In months, this can accumulate a lot of passive income for many so I'm definitely happy that it can help humanity live sustainable lives. I would even consider it a literal gift from the Gods. I just really think if renewable energy is properly utilized here it can achieve its full potential economically and environmentally wise. One could even be entirely independent.

I completey agree though that there is some BS going on here, especially how he's now pushing for memecoin. Elon made a recent tweet stating he does believe in crypto but is against the mining process, however, why bring this up now?

- There are only 21 million bitcoins that can be mined in total.

- Once bitcoin miners have unlocked all the bitcoins, the planet's supply will essentially be tapped out.

- As of February 24, 2021, 18.638 million bitcoins have been mined, which leaves 2.362 million yet to be introduced into circulation.

What happens when all 21 million coins are mined up? And from the looks of it, that may be coming soon.

I guess we buy the dip and take advantage of the crash. I don't think it's a bad idea to invest in some decent GPU's too if one plans to get into mining, especially with the idea I brought up here, as a bitcoin sell off almost always follows up with an ease to GPU supply and price. There will always be other crypto coins viable for mining, and maybe expect a dynamic shift when Bitcoin is completely mined as miners move on to others coins, in turn effecting their supply and demand. Etherium for sure imo.

 

[Gearshift]

What happens when all 21 million coins are mined up? And from the looks of it, that may be coming soon.

I guess we buy the dip and take advantage of the crash. I don't think it's a bad idea to invest in some decent GPU's too if one plans to get into mining, especially with the idea I brought up here, as a bitcoin sell off almost always follows up with an ease to GPU supply and price. There will always be other crypto coins viable for mining, and maybe expect a dynamic shift when Bitcoin is completely mined as miners move on to others coins, in turn effecting their supply and demand. Etherium for sure imo.

I think from what you stated you seem to have some slight ignorance on crypto and Bitcoin itself.

Even after all the bitcoins have been mined you still need to mine. Mining = not just bitcoin acquisition to gain bitcoins but also Transaction fee.

For example to transfer 1 billion dollars from America to Europe requires a wire call, a wire creation, and several days to process plus chunks are processed not a full amount. Obviously in modern day some banks may just fire everything out but there are liabilities. The processing fee is 7% or about 75million dollar. So you gotta move 1 billion + about 75million to pay the fee.

A bitcoin transaction from a few years ago was 200 million, the transaction fee was about 0.35btc or about 18-25 dollars. Instant or within 10 minutes, pseudo-anonymous, mathematically secure further than central bank transaction, we know 200 million was transferred but we don't know the names nor the object or reason as to why it was transferred.

For example say in the future every smartphone mines. The mining process or transaction fee acquisition can be done by anyone. This is why it's called a lottery a smartphone is a small number of lottery tickets and a mining pool or mining computer is a bigger calculator.

Well funny enough EVEN IF a computer has more power or a room or a warehouse by the matters of mathematical luck i.e. zero counting of 30 zeros in the header of the calculation. Even a person who mines(transaction fee only not mining bitcoin itself) COULD probably take the transaction fee.

In other words say someone transfers 300,000 dollars worth of bitcoin. The transaction fee is set at 0.032274328btc or about 45 dollars. Even a person with a smartphone miner would with luck outtake any computer and boom a random person on Earth receives 45 dollars worth of btc. Obviously it's luck and computational power but you never know. For example China poses about 65% of the computing power but it would behoove them if they acted as a state-actor to attack bitcoin.

Bitcoin incentivizes legal process. Mining bitcoin and Mining for transaction fee the instant to 10 minute to 90 minute calculation.

BTW even if 21 million coins are mined btc will get richer over time. It's deflationary not necessarily it's main goal it wasn't built for that but it works non-the less. Funny enough as of June 2018 86 billion dollars worth of btc or 20% has been lost by people. One guy in England small town is paying them 225 million sterling from btc to save his HDD so he can recover about 7,500btc.

So as time goes on this number increases the scarcer bitcoin is the more wealth acquired. For example even if a single btc remains people will still make money and make coins from the infinite divisibility Up and down. For example down microtransaction imagine playing a video game to make btc or imagine playing an MMORPG with btc or imagine a virtual blockchain coin in a video game redeemable for real-world btc.

Imagine instead of paying 7 dollars for a full album of music only paying a few cents or tens of cents for two or three songs as all the songs on it suck except two or three. So even if we pay less deflate and charge things people still make money. The entire point of crypto really outshine even Hitler's financial desire. Even many NSDAP financial strategies would become obsolete with some theorycrafting.

In reality crypto and Bitcoin is experimental it's really going far beyond anything. It still is being created and experimented with.

As for mining it might even prove useful one day to check all bitcoins find out how many are a missing and recreate the mining era with less gains of bitcoin and re-mine btc to restore the full 21 million. Say in 2180 there are only 12 million coins in existence, all have been mined. Well funny enough so much time has passed no one recovered the remaining it's gone it might prove useful to do a check on all btc recreate the 9 million and let miners remine the 9 million btc to recover the 21,000,000 and do it with MUCH less gains. Obviously BTC could be worth trillions of dollars per coin.

In reality this is a revolution it's really a year zero a National Socialist/Satanic year zero a bloodless coup. Unlike the communist/kosher bullshit of a bloody year zero.

These cyberpunks should be renamed to CyberNazis.

WHOM ever is or group Satoshi is probably a NatSoc individual. Only a mad genius of epic capacity could come up with this. Whoever Dei Wai is who came up with the theorycrafting beginnings really is a miracle worker.

Crypto is only going to go up.

At Specter study crypto especially Bitcoin. Go to Bitcoin.org and study the resources and everything. You still need to chip off some ignorance on crypto.

Don't listen to musk he is a fucking retard if dogecoin was worth 7 cents and you bought a lot and he is moving against the market and you sell at 40 cents you could have made many thousands of dollars. So listen to all these investors and all these people and hodl the line.

Do what the enemy does they are moving towards crypto they want to berg and stein it. Might as well enrich yourself in the process. Money talks and talk is cheap so watch the action not the noise coming out of their retarded mouths against crypto.

If HP.Cobra studied this stuff and said this is "Good". Listen to HP.Cobra because he wants to help listen to everyone study the shit out of crypto get as much as you can.

Imagine you bought Amazon stocks years ago in today's time Amazon stock is like Apple stock. You could have made 10-100s of millions BILLIONS?

Crypto is the Hitler Money. Cryptocurrencies = Nazi/NatSoc money.

In reality cryptomoney is beyond Hitler and beyond NSDAP and beyond NSDAP Finances even the great Gottfried Feder or Dr. Hjalmer Greely Schant would have to basically recreate their Welt-anschaang(World-view). Crypto = evolution.

Even a civilization of sufficient Spiritual and technological evolution would realize this is how we help people.

It might be risky and volatile but it's only trying to stabilize. I believe crypto will stabilize and help the World.