My post is about Hitler's faults in ww2

[Kadisiye]

Especially about western front of it.

As people say, Hitler and his generals made mistakes in ww2. I know some of them for now. As an example; Hitler waiting for the allies landings from Pas De Calais but campaign came from normandy. Second example, in the middle of battle of bulge, hitler ordered full assault on Paris, even objective was not Paris but Belgium. Why hitler and his teammades was choose wrong decisions in the war? Were if they talked with gods, how they made mistakes? Or are we know something wrong? Please straighten me. Thanks.

 

[luis]

Especially about western front of it.

As people say, Hitler and his generals made mistakes in ww2. I know some of them for now. As an example; Hitler waiting for the allies landings from Pas De Calais but campaign came from normandy. Second example, in the middle of battle of bulge, hitler ordered full assault on Paris, even objective was not Paris but Belgium. Why hitler and his teammades was choose wrong decisions in the war? Were if they talked with gods, how they made mistakes? Or are we know something wrong? Please straighten me. Thanks.

The planet was at the time full of jewish curses and they did not have the Rtrs. Now think about it, with all those curses they probabily could not comunicate with the God's correctly and their mistakes is because of some curses. What they did is still awesome and a miracle, they are the only reasons the whole world was not enslaved at that time with communism and today we are more free and able to fight the enemy.

The only reason now we can fight the enemy is because of the internet, it was not a thing back then and you could not reach the whole world. Imagine if Maxine tried to fight the enemy spiritualy if she was born during ww2, how many people she could reach? 1000? Too little to what is needed, plus she needed to comunicate all the things by gathering them. It would have been a mess. The God's know about this and they waited to the right time to come.

 

[Hp. Hoodedcobra666]

Especially about western front of it.

As people say, Hitler and his generals made mistakes in ww2. I know some of them for now. As an example; Hitler waiting for the allies landings from Pas De Calais but campaign came from normandy. Second example, in the middle of battle of bulge, hitler ordered full assault on Paris, even objective was not Paris but Belgium. Why hitler and his teammades was choose wrong decisions in the war? Were if they talked with gods, how they made mistakes? Or are we know something wrong? Please straighten me. Thanks.

These mistakes are judged after the fact, not during the fact. And these mistakes are also what anyone can claim was a mistake, without knowing any of the full information that went into making decisions.

Hitler's orders were at upwards to a close 100% correct rate. This is impossible for a normal human being where most decisions are errant.

Others also made major decisions in the world, such as generals. Generals were not in communication, as weren't many others making decisions. Decisions during war change faster than one can think, from all attacking and defending sides.

Wars are about information and a hundred fronts going at the same time. The influx of information and events is bigger than that of a single event.

 

[Kadisiye]

Especially about western front of it.

As people say, Hitler and his generals made mistakes in ww2. I know some of them for now. As an example; Hitler waiting for the allies landings from Pas De Calais but campaign came from normandy. Second example, in the middle of battle of bulge, hitler ordered full assault on Paris, even objective was not Paris but Belgium. Why hitler and his teammades was choose wrong decisions in the war? Were if they talked with gods, how they made mistakes? Or are we know something wrong? Please straighten me. Thanks.

These mistakes are judged after the fact, not during the fact. And these mistakes are also what anyone can claim was a mistake, without knowing any of the full information that went into making decisions.

Hitler's orders were at upwards to a close 100% correct rate. This is impossible for a normal human being where most decisions are errant.

Others also made major decisions in the world, such as generals. Generals were not in communication, as weren't many others making decisions. Decisions during war change faster than one can think, from all attacking and defending sides.

Wars are about information and a hundred fronts going at the same time. The influx of information and events is bigger than that of a single event.

Thanks. My other question is about operation highjump. What did they do there and what happened?

 

[Gearshift]

Do note not all of Hitler's peoples were on his side. Even in his Government there were a few closeted marxists but it seems some of these people realized eventually marxism isn't the way.

Same for his Generals and military. For example there is a story of how Heydrich annoyed Himmler every chance he got at putting the Abwher under the SS. Abwher being the NS spy agency for the Nation. Well one day Himmler just shuts Heydrich down telling him no. January 1945 Himmler probably opens up his newspaper and reads "Wilhelm Canaris tried as double agent spying for the Allies/Soviets".

Some people believe Canaras's spying for the allies probably did a tremendous amount of damage to Germany. But even WITH the information the allies had. The allies still couldn't really use it very well. There's a number of historians who believe this is one of the major downfalls of Germany during WW2. And while quite correct even at Kursk which the Soviets new about almost two or three weeks before like it was said even some Allied/Soviet attacks occurred before German generals had the information updated. They couldn't really defeat the Germans. Many historians believe Germany's loses were because of this. Just because the Soviets KNEW sometimes days or weeks ahead of time. Doesn't mean the Germans didn't fight in some cases annihilating entire Soviet forces. The Soviets just zerg'd the Germans till they had to retreat.

A side example is a book I read of the 1st W-SS Adolf Hitler Libenstandart division. They fought inside a forest a well known outcropping in Poland. Well funny enough to put it simply had the 1st W-SS AHL wasn't there the Soviets would have ended the war or entered Germany/Berlin two weeks earlier. The German would fight so ferociously that it's the same thing as higher generational warfare in William Lind's booklet.

For example in Iraq the American's managed to make a Iraqi city surrender to them back during the invasion of Iraq within 3 days the city was theirs. There was a funeral procession they broke formation stepped outside to the sides of the road and mourned with the Iraqis passing by the news spread throughout the city and 3 days later the American's had the city. Same thing happened when some little kids got in another city Ak47 they sprayed Ak fire on American positions the Americans ran after them when they ran out of ammunition. They brought the pre-teens to the city square and started smacking their asses with their hands one teen was smacked in the ass with a belt he borrowed from one of the Iraqis. The Iraqi people laughed their ass off the news spread and eventually the city surrendered to the Americans.

Same thing here the Germans and their allies especially the Russian/Baltic/Ukrainian/Belorussian people fought tooth and nail. So many seemingly miraculous spying Canaris did on the Soviets never really let them defeat the Germans decisively. Rather quite the opposite the Axis fought so hard the only reason the Soviets won was they zerg'd the Germans.

Same thing happened various times throughout Barbarossa early on. For example the death of Hitler's General for Stalingrad being replaced by the traitor Paulis who ignored Goering and Hitler's orders. Other issues like for example Why did the Germans ignore Leningrad they could have captured the city in a number of hours maybe a day or two with only 10,000-15,000 Soviets in it. ON top of that like one book I read had Leningrad been captured the real northern jewel could have been captured. The Axis would have swung North to Archangle and taken the main supply line of the illegal lend lease support. In essence all the British and especially American equipment and supplies would have been stymied completely and even the Uboats would have had a fun time sinking more vessels returning back to American/British ports hearing the news that the main lendlease area of the Soviets was taken.

Like one person said had everything gone exactly the way Hitler outlined the situation and certain people weren't traitors to the cause. Soviet Union by the beginning of Winter would have surrendered. Perhaps not everyone not especially the jews and their communistic activities. They'd probably continue partisaning and continue to back up into the Urals and Siberia. In reality it begs the question if Hitler planed on taking all of Russia for all intents and purposes the surrender conditions would probably include ALL of Russia is to be surrendered Siberia included not just European Ural/Russia. Rather the Germans expect peaceful surrender of Siberia as German forces spread throughout the Siberian continent.

There's also a member who posted something interesting about one of the Cauldron battles that should have been a German victory rather than a breakout of Soviet forces living to fight another day. Apparently the German general in question completely ignored the Ukrainian cauldron battle and let 750,000 Soviet forces escape could have been one of the biggest if not outright biggest cauldron battle during the War.

There's a lot of reasons as to why this or why that on both sides. For example on Sea Lion had Hitler not been goaded by rabbi churchill when he made his 10 times speech. IF they bomb us with 10 tons we'll do 100 tons, if they bomb us with 100 tons we'll bomb them with 1000 tons.

Had Hitler said I'm sick and tired of the British illegally bombing our cities but if the RAF and the British are gonna be starved and running out of supplies requiring yet again illegal supplies from the American's then lets continue bombing them for a few more weeks.

Had Hitler stayed the course with bombing Military-Industrial and RAF bases England might have sued for peace or begrudgingly come to the discussion table. Same thing would have happened had Rommel been given all the supplies he needed to push the British, take the Middle East, and maybe even put guns on the Indian border which would have redlined the British call to surrender. On top of that some Alternative Historians believe Rommel's push into Caucasus Mountain range would have made easier to knock the immediate fuel supply of the Soviets and another position to reinforce German forces unto Stalingrad. On top of that you can make the argument by taking the Caucasus region the Germans could have had forces on the other side of the river and pushed directly in front of the Soviets into Stalingrade and besides on the river pushing the main Soviet bridgehead thus a combination of land and air would have made the soviets back off Stalingrad.

There's also the whole issue with Moscow many people don't know this but it's believed some German scouts pushed as far as 4-6 blocks into Moscow again the German push into Moscow is miraculous as considering the Moscovy-Smolensk line is the strongest of the Soviets. Why Army Group Center pushed into the strongest positions of the Soviets and funny enough won decisively is a miracle of warfare. But again why the struggle and suffering. Many Alternative historians believe Moscow should have either been strangulated from afar or pushed on both sides from the North and South Leningrad-Swap region and Stalingrad lower region. With the middle distracting Soviet forces but not pushing into their direct defenses and making a giant cauldron battle pushing the Soviets in all directions and squeezing the life out of them.

Despite Moscow being railway central and controlling the split lower and upper railways. The opposite would be control the lower and upper railway maybe even send forces rearward and close off Siberian railways and just let the main bulk starve away.

There's also other things like for example in current times i.e. modern current combat we drop special forces and on top of that even though paratroopers are more like main fighter/engineers sometimes paratroopers act like special forces. Perhaps not trained or not involved with special forces but acting like subordinates.

There's a few historians who question Hitler's elimination of the Fallschirmjager or Paratrooper force. Once the Greek incident occurred Hitler just completely got away from Paratroopers. It's reminiscent of the Black Hawk Down incident in Mogadishu the battle should have taken place at night, should have been a 20-40 minute operation and probably by daybreak the Mogadishu warlord would have been on a plane to America facing trial.

The same thing here the FSJ failed to take Crete. It was a blood bath a phyrric victory. And Hitler relegated the paratroopers to rear guard duty at airforce bases.

Some Alternative Historians believe the paratroopers of Germany could have been used as noise makers or army shakers in the deep areas of Russia forcing soviet soldiers to move back into cauldron battles. In other words much akin to the 2011 Benghazi battle by U.S. special forces. The entire point of paratroops and special forces is to not directly engage the enemy and work to create issues but IF they face the enemy to create enough noise that it seems like an entire army is coming in. Often times making the enemy scared and even retreat into the main army often times pushing them into annihilation.

Some Alternative Historians state Hitler should have used paratroopers more like the allies and especially Americans who even though suffered a surprising amount of loses on Paratroopers. The fact of the matter is their tactics and usage and as well as the ability to materialize armies in the middle of your opponents lines proved to America and the World that air power and especially paratroopers are a huge boon to your military if your able to sustain such action. Think like China why do you think they copy cat Soviet and non-Soviet forces just as the Soviets quickly learned paratroopers rock, so did the Americans the soviets might have doctrined it into a full frontal European assault but America realized it and uses it in a much more sneaky and less direct way. So it begs the question are paratroopers meant to be used directly full force full battle or are they a support noise maker, special forces style group of multi-faceted forces engineer/special ops/front line fighter and meant to be a support rather than simply materializing armies in your opponents lines.

In simplest terms were the Soviet style practical and useful i.e. Paratrooper armies. Or is the German/American support tactical fighter the way to use paratroopers.

I digress the fact of the matter is in Hitler's time especially as some people don't pay attention to danger and are more docile and less informative. There were traitors perhaps some of Hitler's people saw the Soviet paradise as great or were under the enemy control perhaps paid like earlier with Ernst Rohm and the contribution of 2.5 million francs to his wallet which got him killed.

Perhaps a combination perhaps most of all the ignorance and this eternal cock sucking of christ and jews. But one thing is for sure. If America wasn't as cucked as it is now and goes to war no one is a traitor or a spy for China. Certainly like Hitler stated in Dalton's Mein Kampf edition. The Germans during WW1 fought for prosperity and World peace through cooperative businesses and the Germans believed that even scoffing at the British for simply stating "We fight for FREEDOM". Funny enough after a few months as WW1 continued and really as time went on more and more German soldiers fell in disbelief that the enemy would fight simply for an idea/ideal rather than practical real world materia.

So Hitler learned the way to fight is to have your own ideal even if it posses no material substance. People are more willing to fight and die for a mere idea rather than physical hard concrete material things.

If you can convince a person to fight for freedom and truly believe being free is superior than being paid millions or billions of dollars to fight for a cause. They will fight to the death.

Akin to the Fallout memes what does Alpha Prime state the decapitated automaton "Death is preferable than Communism".

I guess in Hitler's time these generals and these traitors never really saw eye to eye with helping mankind. Perhaps their religious fervor or their education made them believe "We exist for a few decades then ascend to heaven for eternity, Amen". Amen indeed if you believe life is a worthless suffering and struggle just to exist forever in a pipe dream. Then something is really wrong with you. Even the enemy the jew doesn't state such non-sense to their people.

These people and really many people of today really believe life is worthless and not worth living they literally just exist to have fun waste time and get ready for the heavenly ascension.

What can I say some people are just cucks, cucks be cucks.

Same thing happened back in the 10s-20s-30s-40s. Just a bunch of cucks.