Is it worth having a child with a vaccinated woman?

[StyleCoin]

I have seen several scientific articles about how deadly vaccines are, and I would like to know if it is dangerous to have children with a vaccinated person.

 

[darkmonkey666]

Have a child with the one you love. That is far more important. Not everyone who got it even had a choice so anyways better would be if you love this person do a working to help heal her of any damage first or have her do it before having kids.

Everything I read tells me this is mostly reversible with workings.

 

[darkmonkey666]

And this is not a promotion of the vaccines at all but the enemy would love this freak out and discrimination type thing placing people in groups. So I am trying to fight that here with my respons.

 

[newbie40]

Yes because you are making sure your unvaxxed gene will survive

 

[Stormblood]

The real question is that this woman still is fertile and is going to be able to gestate and give birth without complications. There is a big chance she won't be because of what these fakecines do. Infertility and miscarriages are main "side" effects (actually one of the most intended effects).

The other question is "Is this woman a supporter of fakecines or not?". If she is, then it's best to stay away from her or, at least, not have any children until her mindset grows. Immature people are not fit to marry and have children, and supporting a fake clinical trials shows many signs of immaturity: she believes everything she reads, she does not questions things, she does not do her own in-depth research, she "goes with the flows" and let others dominate her life instead of living it, she has a weak mind and soul, and so on. Would you want to have a child with her, considering she will be passing half of her karma to the child and this half will include all this evil traits?

When children are conceived, they get half of their karma from their parents and the other half is made of everything that is left from their past lives. This is prenatal karma. In the scenario, their karma is 25% you, 25% her, 50% the child. If they don't have a past life, like it's common nowadays with many new souls being created by weaklings, then he'll be 50/50.

Notice I emphasised that she supports the fakecines, not that she had to forcefully take it because whatever. Those are different cases.

 

[ChaosBringer666]

When children are conceived, they get half of their karma from their parents and the other half is made of everything that is left from their past lives. This is prenatal karma. In the scenario, their karma is 25% you, 25% her, 50% the child. If they don't have a past life, like it's common nowadays with many new souls being created by weaklings, then he'll be 50/50.

Really? that's interesting. I always thought it was just past lives. Neet-O

 

[Nazista lunar]

No. It is not worth it.

 

[NinRick]

The real question is that this woman still is fertile and is going to be able to gestate and give birth without complications. There is a big chance she won't be because of what these fakecines do. Infertility and miscarriages are main "side" effects (actually one of the most intended effects).

The other question is "Is this woman a supporter of fakecines or not?". If she is, then it's best to stay away from her or, at least, not have any children until her mindset grows. Immature people are not fit to marry and have children, and supporting a fake clinical trials shows many signs of immaturity: she believes everything she reads, she does not questions things, she does not do her own in-depth research, she "goes with the flows" and let others dominate her life instead of living it, she has a weak mind and soul, and so on. Would you want to have a child with her, considering she will be passing half of her karma to the child and this half will include all this evil traits?

When children are conceived, they get half of their karma from their parents and the other half is made of everything that is left from their past lives. This is prenatal karma. In the scenario, their karma is 25% you, 25% her, 50% the child. If they don't have a past life, like it's common nowadays with many new souls being created by weaklings, then he'll be 50/50.

Notice I emphasised that she supports the fakecines, not that she had to forcefully take it because whatever. Those are different cases.

About the Karma stuff, I have no clue about that tbh, as I have no way of testing that, however, to me it makes sense that the Parents act like a sort of catalyst. Everything actually comes from your own soul, as well as your DNA, you just need fitting parents to express that traits.

As I said, this is just what I think and feel about it.

 

[CaspianTheDreamer]

The real question is that this woman still is fertile and is going to be able to gestate and give birth without complications. There is a big chance she won't be because of what these fakecines do. Infertility and miscarriages are main "side" effects (actually one of the most intended effects).

The other question is "Is this woman a supporter of fakecines or not?". If she is, then it's best to stay away from her or, at least, not have any children until her mindset grows. Immature people are not fit to marry and have children, and supporting a fake clinical trials shows many signs of immaturity: she believes everything she reads, she does not questions things, she does not do her own in-depth research, she "goes with the flows" and let others dominate her life instead of living it, she has a weak mind and soul, and so on. Would you want to have a child with her, considering she will be passing half of her karma to the child and this half will include all this evil traits?

When children are conceived, they get half of their karma from their parents and the other half is made of everything that is left from their past lives. This is prenatal karma. In the scenario, their karma is 25% you, 25% her, 50% the child. If they don't have a past life, like it's common nowadays with many new souls being created by weaklings, then he'll be 50/50.

Notice I emphasised that she supports the fakecines, not that she had to forcefully take it because whatever. Those are different cases.

This is off topic, but what about the natal planets? Do the planets add extra karma aspects to the child or are they indicators of the karma the newborn human has? Im kinda confused about the relations between karma and the planets... but then again, I do know that Saturn is the planet that deals with the negative karma....but what about the other ones??? Do the other planets add more, or possibly different karma to the individual? Or do the planets and the karma one has go hand in hand in one direction??? Sorry if this was a bit confusing

 

[Stormblood]

The real question is that this woman still is fertile and is going to be able to gestate and give birth without complications. There is a big chance she won't be because of what these fakecines do. Infertility and miscarriages are main "side" effects (actually one of the most intended effects).

The other question is "Is this woman a supporter of fakecines or not?". If she is, then it's best to stay away from her or, at least, not have any children until her mindset grows. Immature people are not fit to marry and have children, and supporting a fake clinical trials shows many signs of immaturity: she believes everything she reads, she does not questions things, she does not do her own in-depth research, she "goes with the flows" and let others dominate her life instead of living it, she has a weak mind and soul, and so on. Would you want to have a child with her, considering she will be passing half of her karma to the child and this half will include all this evil traits?

When children are conceived, they get half of their karma from their parents and the other half is made of everything that is left from their past lives. This is prenatal karma. In the scenario, their karma is 25% you, 25% her, 50% the child. If they don't have a past life, like it's common nowadays with many new souls being created by weaklings, then he'll be 50/50.

Notice I emphasised that she supports the fakecines, not that she had to forcefully take it because whatever. Those are different cases.

This is off topic, but what about the natal planets? Do the planets add extra karma aspects to the child or are they indicators of the karma the newborn human has? Im kinda confused about the relations between karma and the planets... but then again, I do know that Saturn is the planet that deals with the negative karma....but what about the other ones??? Do the other planets add more, or possibly different karma to the individual? Or do the planets and the karma one has go hand in hand in one direction??? Sorry if this was a bit confusing

All planets really deal with karma. Your chart is the accumulation of all the work done in your past lives and/or by your parents and ancestors. In the case of a new-born, it is only parents and ancestors, as far as I know. The so-called family karma. The father's karma is mainly part of your natal Saturn, the mother's karma is part of your natal Moon. Obviously, the chart needs to be taken into consideration fully. So you consider not just placements but also aspects and fixed stars.

In the case of new-born souls, I am still not 100% sure if they get something extra like you say or not. It's not very clean-cut. The Gods will be able to provide a more in-depth and precise explanation especially those who are specialised in astrology, such as Lord Furcas and Lord Azazel.

 

[CaspianTheDreamer]

The real question is that this woman still is fertile and is going to be able to gestate and give birth without complications. There is a big chance she won't be because of what these fakecines do. Infertility and miscarriages are main "side" effects (actually one of the most intended effects).

The other question is "Is this woman a supporter of fakecines or not?". If she is, then it's best to stay away from her or, at least, not have any children until her mindset grows. Immature people are not fit to marry and have children, and supporting a fake clinical trials shows many signs of immaturity: she believes everything she reads, she does not questions things, she does not do her own in-depth research, she "goes with the flows" and let others dominate her life instead of living it, she has a weak mind and soul, and so on. Would you want to have a child with her, considering she will be passing half of her karma to the child and this half will include all this evil traits?

When children are conceived, they get half of their karma from their parents and the other half is made of everything that is left from their past lives. This is prenatal karma. In the scenario, their karma is 25% you, 25% her, 50% the child. If they don't have a past life, like it's common nowadays with many new souls being created by weaklings, then he'll be 50/50.

Notice I emphasised that she supports the fakecines, not that she had to forcefully take it because whatever. Those are different cases.

This is off topic, but what about the natal planets? Do the planets add extra karma aspects to the child or are they indicators of the karma the newborn human has? Im kinda confused about the relations between karma and the planets... but then again, I do know that Saturn is the planet that deals with the negative karma....but what about the other ones??? Do the other planets add more, or possibly different karma to the individual? Or do the planets and the karma one has go hand in hand in one direction??? Sorry if this was a bit confusing

All planets really deal with karma. Your chart is the accumulation of all the work done in your past lives and/or by your parents and ancestors. In the case of a new-born, it is only parents and ancestors, as far as I know. The so-called family karma. The father's karma is mainly part of your natal Saturn, the mother's karma is part of your natal Moon. Obviously, the chart needs to be taken into consideration fully. So you consider not just placements but also aspects and fixed stars.

In the case of new-born souls, I am still not 100% sure if they get something extra like you say or not. It's not very clean-cut. The Gods will be able to provide a more in-depth and precise explanation especially those who are specialised in astrology, such as Lord Furcas and Lord Azazel.

Thank you so much for replying