StraitShot47
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2017
- Messages
- 793
Coming from a hetrosexual, I gots to know.
FancyMancy said:Am I going to be the first to use the saying "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder"? At the same time, most people are bisexual anyway, so that saying might be more nonsense than not. It has to do with the Soul and Kundalini being raised - the Kundalini is very sexual in Nature, and limiting yourself, if your Natural inclination is not to be restricted, limits types and ways for sexual freedom/union. There is different sexual pleasure to be had with Males and with Females, and then more so with both. Besides, the Male form and Female form are very, very, very, very similar, compared with, say, the Male/Female form and the amoeba form, which look extremely different from each other.
FancyMancy said:Besides, the Male form and Female form are very, very, very, very similar, compared with, say, the Male/Female form and the amoeba form, which look extremely different from each other.
Edelwise said:FancyMancy said:Besides, the Male form and Female form are very, very, very, very similar, compared with, say, the Male/Female form and the amoeba form, which look extremely different from each other.
I heard that amoebas are ravenous creatures though.
StraitShot47 said:Coming from a hetrosexual, I gots to know.
StraitShot47 said:FancyMancy said:Am I going to be the first to use the saying "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder"? At the same time, most people are bisexual anyway, so that saying might be more nonsense than not. It has to do with the Soul and Kundalini being raised - the Kundalini is very sexual in Nature, and limiting yourself, if your Natural inclination is not to be restricted, limits types and ways for sexual freedom/union. There is different sexual pleasure to be had with Males and with Females, and then more so with both. Besides, the Male form and Female form are very, very, very, very similar, compared with, say, the Male/Female form and the amoeba form, which look extremely different from each other.
The first paragraph is what I mean.
I don't think it's wrong or gay[or even bi] to admit when someone looks better than oneself or others. I don't agree with eye of the beholder, beautiful is beautiful from a neutral stand point.
I like to think of myself as a good looking fellow, I'd say 7 or 8 on a scale of ten. From my limited experiences I have found about 90% of gays are closer to the 9 or 10 scale.
I was just wondering why most males gays usually are very good looking.
Do you mean genetic/physical attractiveness ?StraitShot47 said:Coming from a hetrosexual, I gots to know.
You are 100% right!StraitShot47 said:Edelwise said:FancyMancy said:Besides, the Male form and Female form are very, very, very, very similar, compared with, say, the Male/Female form and the amoeba form, which look extremely different from each other.
I heard that amoebas are ravenous creatures though.
I thought an amoeba was this;
An amoeba, often called amoeboid, is a type of cell or unicellular organism which has the ability to alter its shape, primarily by extending and retracting pseudopods. Amoebas do not form a single taxonomic group; instead, they are found in every major lineage of eukaryotic organisms.
I think there was a post which suggested that there are Physical features which more or less constitutes homosexual men. (Dare we say "the gay gene"?!) I think it has to do with what you said about Natural beauty - with more liberty instead of kike restrictions, we can realise that people are beautiful, whether you're gay, bi, or straight.StraitShot47 said:I was just wondering why most males gays usually are very good looking.
Lol, say that again but instead of "amoebas", say "dog" or "pig"! Then realise something! Eek!Edelwise said:FancyMancy said:Besides, the Male form and Female form are very, very, very, very similar, compared with, say, the Male/Female form and the amoeba form, which look extremely different from each other.
I heard that amoebas are ravenous creatures though.
Fancy!StraitShot47 said:Edelwise said:FancyMancy said:Besides, the Male form and Female form are very, very, very, very similar, compared with, say, the Male/Female form and the amoeba form, which look extremely different from each other.
I heard that amoebas are ravenous creatures though.
I thought an amoeba was this;
An amoeba, often called amoeboid, is a type of cell or unicellular organism which has the ability to alter its shape, primarily by extending and retracting pseudopods. Amoebas do not form a single taxonomic group; instead, they are found in every major lineage of eukaryotic organisms.
StraitShot47 said:Coming from a hetrosexual, I gots to know.
"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan