EasternFireLion666
Well-known member
This is the source. Seems it happened in January. Also posting the PDF from the European Council site.
https://pace.coe.int/en/files/29004/html?fbclid=IwAR2y41SoAgPPdssv5W1MQFaTzdkY4EmUUeuyVt1X4ow8P68uIir9hey_8kY
PDF:
https://pace.coe.int/pdf/2e0ee40b5d6c4e2e5df5467478961f7561e651733326667a8259ffe25682ae848428feba12/resolution%202361.pdf
Section 7.3 is the relevant one:
"7.3 with respect to ensuring high vaccine uptake:
7.3.1 ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves;
7.3.2 ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated;
7.3.3 take early effective measures to counter misinformation, disinformation and hesitancy regarding Covid-19 vaccines;
7.3.4 distribute transparent information on the safety and possible side effects of vaccines, working with and regulating social media platforms to prevent the spread of misinformation;
7.3.5 communicate transparently the contents of contracts with vaccine producers and make them publicly available for parliamentary and public scrutiny;
7.3.6 collaborate with non-governmental organisations and/or other local efforts to reach out to marginalised groups;
7.3.7 engage with local communities in developing and implementing tailored strategies to support vaccine uptake;"
MY NOTE: Even if later they will change those rules and decide for mandatory, the fact that people saw this decision being reversed after they had some hope may backfire very bad against them. So it is good that this happened. As many people as possible should know about this decision.
https://pace.coe.int/en/files/29004/html?fbclid=IwAR2y41SoAgPPdssv5W1MQFaTzdkY4EmUUeuyVt1X4ow8P68uIir9hey_8kY
PDF:
https://pace.coe.int/pdf/2e0ee40b5d6c4e2e5df5467478961f7561e651733326667a8259ffe25682ae848428feba12/resolution%202361.pdf
Section 7.3 is the relevant one:
"7.3 with respect to ensuring high vaccine uptake:
7.3.1 ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves;
7.3.2 ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated;
7.3.3 take early effective measures to counter misinformation, disinformation and hesitancy regarding Covid-19 vaccines;
7.3.4 distribute transparent information on the safety and possible side effects of vaccines, working with and regulating social media platforms to prevent the spread of misinformation;
7.3.5 communicate transparently the contents of contracts with vaccine producers and make them publicly available for parliamentary and public scrutiny;
7.3.6 collaborate with non-governmental organisations and/or other local efforts to reach out to marginalised groups;
7.3.7 engage with local communities in developing and implementing tailored strategies to support vaccine uptake;"
MY NOTE: Even if later they will change those rules and decide for mandatory, the fact that people saw this decision being reversed after they had some hope may backfire very bad against them. So it is good that this happened. As many people as possible should know about this decision.
