Jack
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2018
- Messages
- 3,966
This DoD-commissioned report on "Strategic Consequences of Chinese Racism" makes for interesting reading. For example: "The Chinese see multiculturalism as a sickness that has overtaken the United States, and a component of U.S. decline."
Although the report is almost 10 years old, it calls attention to the "anti-racist" CRT-inspired propaganda that was already so pervasive in U.S. entertainment and education. (The author is praising this effort, in contrast to China).
To his credit, the author acknowledges that racism, xenophobia, and ethnocentrism are evolved, and adaptive - rather than something dreamed up by wicked colonizers in 1619. But he laments to failure of China to adopt the western "civil rights" perspective.
The report traces historic and cultural influences contributing to Chinese ethnocentrism and the concept of race - from ancient times to the 20th century - including Sun Yat-sen who viewed the Chinese as "a single, pure race" and stated that "the greatest force is common blood."
Under Mao, the communists pushed the now-familiar anti-white view that only westerners could be "racists" and that even the Russian communists were suspect due to their "whiteness." But tensions with Africans undermined calls for non-white solidarity.
In contrast to western countries, China maintains a strong sense or racial identity and pride. Unlike westerners, the Chinese can see themselves as part of an extended family, descended from common ancestors.
The report asserts that racial stereotypes are common in China - including negative views of other Asians - views likely to horrify any western liberal.
While white male Americans are persona-non-grata at home, they may be encouraged to know that Chinese women have a different perspective.
According to the report, other foreign races are viewed less favorably.
The Chinese are perplexed by America's pivot to "multiculturalism" - "the United States is explicitly rejecting the principles that made the country great, and united it."
"... all of this conspires to cause the breakdown of American society and the lack of purpose in life ..."
The report speculated that racism would hurt China's reputation in the Third World (My comment: this does not seem to have had much of an impact). The report notes that "There were major riots by African students at Chinese universities in 1962, 1979, 1980, 1986, 1988, and 1989."
Worldwide, Chinese clannishness and networking is thought to promote their success. But this generates resentment. Shame on you if this brings to mind any parallels.
Reluctantly, the report acknowledges important strategic advantages of Chinese "racism:" The Chinese have a sense of unity, idently, community, and confidence.
The report also looks at ethnic tensions in Xinjiang. In brief, Uighurs feel overwhelmed by Han migration. The Han view the Uighurs as backward, and ungrateful for the economic development. (Comment: Another example of how economic growth does *not* ease demographic strife).
Covering the unrest in Tibet, the report mentions that the Chinese are experts at "using their educational system to indoctrinate the population, even among minority peoples and dissidents." Let's hope that never happens here!
The 2013 report argued that the U.S. had a significant "soft power" advantage in that "it is not a racist state."
Unfortunately, the U.S. ruling class spent most of 2020 - 2021 proclaiming that the U.S. definitely *is* a racist state - so this advantage may have been lost.
Source
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1490408671779729425.html
I don't personally like the Chinese state, but there's this thing that no Chinese ever called me "Goyim" and no Chinese went on a TED talk and said that he was going to mass Exterminate everyone with vaccines. No Chinese told me that I would "Own Nothing, Have Nothing and be Happy" or that I had to "Eat Bugs". George Soros calls Xi Xinping the greatest threat to democracy that has ever existed.
And that's because when the Anglo American establishment transferred the brain trust and manufacturing over to China they had an understanding that they would be the manufacturing base and that NATO would be the military strength. But after taking advantage of the Western Elites it seems the Chinese have double Crossed the Western elites and broke off from the Anglo establishment into their own World Order system.
This CIA shill says that China exploits Africa. That's true but they're also building railroads, metro, hospitals etc and they know the Africans won't be able to pay them back so that land will be theirs for hundreds of years. That's better than going into an African country and Genociding random people or forcing them to undergo LGBTQ agendas and Feminism. No one in South America and Africa and South Asia likes these kinds of Western Marxist ideologies.
Finally no Chinese ever tried to convice my son to cut their Genitals off and that he was a woman. Xi Xingping has said that Chinese women should have 3 children going against the vicious Anti Natal ideology of the Western Elite.
I'm not a Chinese apologist qnd frankly I don't really care about them. What's interesting is the growing division between these two groups - Western Anglo American Establishment controlled by Jewish Corporations and the Competing Russian and Chinese Establishments.
Although the report is almost 10 years old, it calls attention to the "anti-racist" CRT-inspired propaganda that was already so pervasive in U.S. entertainment and education. (The author is praising this effort, in contrast to China).
To his credit, the author acknowledges that racism, xenophobia, and ethnocentrism are evolved, and adaptive - rather than something dreamed up by wicked colonizers in 1619. But he laments to failure of China to adopt the western "civil rights" perspective.
The report traces historic and cultural influences contributing to Chinese ethnocentrism and the concept of race - from ancient times to the 20th century - including Sun Yat-sen who viewed the Chinese as "a single, pure race" and stated that "the greatest force is common blood."
Under Mao, the communists pushed the now-familiar anti-white view that only westerners could be "racists" and that even the Russian communists were suspect due to their "whiteness." But tensions with Africans undermined calls for non-white solidarity.
In contrast to western countries, China maintains a strong sense or racial identity and pride. Unlike westerners, the Chinese can see themselves as part of an extended family, descended from common ancestors.
The report asserts that racial stereotypes are common in China - including negative views of other Asians - views likely to horrify any western liberal.
While white male Americans are persona-non-grata at home, they may be encouraged to know that Chinese women have a different perspective.
According to the report, other foreign races are viewed less favorably.
The Chinese are perplexed by America's pivot to "multiculturalism" - "the United States is explicitly rejecting the principles that made the country great, and united it."
"... all of this conspires to cause the breakdown of American society and the lack of purpose in life ..."
The report speculated that racism would hurt China's reputation in the Third World (My comment: this does not seem to have had much of an impact). The report notes that "There were major riots by African students at Chinese universities in 1962, 1979, 1980, 1986, 1988, and 1989."
Worldwide, Chinese clannishness and networking is thought to promote their success. But this generates resentment. Shame on you if this brings to mind any parallels.
Reluctantly, the report acknowledges important strategic advantages of Chinese "racism:" The Chinese have a sense of unity, idently, community, and confidence.
The report also looks at ethnic tensions in Xinjiang. In brief, Uighurs feel overwhelmed by Han migration. The Han view the Uighurs as backward, and ungrateful for the economic development. (Comment: Another example of how economic growth does *not* ease demographic strife).
Covering the unrest in Tibet, the report mentions that the Chinese are experts at "using their educational system to indoctrinate the population, even among minority peoples and dissidents." Let's hope that never happens here!
The 2013 report argued that the U.S. had a significant "soft power" advantage in that "it is not a racist state."
Unfortunately, the U.S. ruling class spent most of 2020 - 2021 proclaiming that the U.S. definitely *is* a racist state - so this advantage may have been lost.
Source
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1490408671779729425.html
I don't personally like the Chinese state, but there's this thing that no Chinese ever called me "Goyim" and no Chinese went on a TED talk and said that he was going to mass Exterminate everyone with vaccines. No Chinese told me that I would "Own Nothing, Have Nothing and be Happy" or that I had to "Eat Bugs". George Soros calls Xi Xinping the greatest threat to democracy that has ever existed.
And that's because when the Anglo American establishment transferred the brain trust and manufacturing over to China they had an understanding that they would be the manufacturing base and that NATO would be the military strength. But after taking advantage of the Western Elites it seems the Chinese have double Crossed the Western elites and broke off from the Anglo establishment into their own World Order system.
This CIA shill says that China exploits Africa. That's true but they're also building railroads, metro, hospitals etc and they know the Africans won't be able to pay them back so that land will be theirs for hundreds of years. That's better than going into an African country and Genociding random people or forcing them to undergo LGBTQ agendas and Feminism. No one in South America and Africa and South Asia likes these kinds of Western Marxist ideologies.
Finally no Chinese ever tried to convice my son to cut their Genitals off and that he was a woman. Xi Xingping has said that Chinese women should have 3 children going against the vicious Anti Natal ideology of the Western Elite.
I'm not a Chinese apologist qnd frankly I don't really care about them. What's interesting is the growing division between these two groups - Western Anglo American Establishment controlled by Jewish Corporations and the Competing Russian and Chinese Establishments.
