Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Casteless or class less ? Or both?

sahasrara bliss

New member
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
28

In North India, there are several castes that are spiritually devolved. I can safely assume that just by looking at these caste people, they are physically weak, most of them, are immoral and so stupid, they are dark browned skinned. The vibes they give is a feeling of dryness and kind of disgust.
There r several categories of caste to which government gives special privileges to these lower castes and doesn't give the same to upper class. So where is the equality now? When the world whines about equality, even in India, they become hypocrites when it comes to this topic. Why.. because if equal rights would be given to every caste upper and lower caste, it would destroy lower caste special privileges and they can't survive without it. They are weak and parasites.
To name one, there is a caste called "chamaar or chura" I'm not sure if a person in India gets jailed for calling a chamaar a chamaar because oh it hurts their sentiments. 
So there is a religion,  sikhism whose last leader destroyed caste system in a region and told every follower of the religion to add "Singh & Kaur name as their last/middle name before surname"
So, does NS government also aims to destroy caste system along with class system? No I think? It's important to separate people on caste based to keep ones bloodline pure. No?
 
Casteless is not classless.

People have taken too far and misinterpreted what Classless society means in National Socialism.
First of all let's begin from the fact that the society there is racially and nationally clear. In other words, people have nothing to attack other people for, there is no war between 'rich and poor', all operate in organic co-operation.

Within this context to remove class, does not remove ownership, or financial power, it just removes extreme social blocking which prevents valuable individuals and people or families to ascend simply over the fact of being poor. Within the context of a proper economy, anyone who gives back, is going to take back, and therefore, one's financial situation can be more easily decided by one's efforts.

Classless is a society that was to arise on the fact that one's birth or predetermined financial situation based on that, wasn't to impede someone from social ascent, or rising higher. In other words one is not entirely bound by financial figures on everything they want to do or achieve, but rather, if they prove themselves, that is enough for them to be given the means to proceed. People have opportunities to do things, and they are not bound.
The "Classless" of the National Socialists was not based on abolishing order of ranking of life, but bolstering. The strong and capable would consolidate themselves in their level. For those who were giving fewer things to the community, they would have enough.

This is like playing a game on normal rules, without "pay to win". Pay to win is the reality now in many so called "Democracies". This, aside other problems like racial struggle, people having class warfare (The rich attacking the poor and vice versa) creates a situation where a civilization can collapse. The enemy creates this situation to keep thriving from the pain of others.
Hitler did bring the rich people and the poor people together through national bonding, and in front of a common race and national mission. The rich would help the poor improve their living situations, provide them with jobs, and help elevate society, and not only look after themselves. Likewise, the poor would have nothing to hate from the rich, but only see them for once as racial people of their own volk who are providers of work, and managers of social structures or wealth. Classless does not mean abolishment of anyone from anything, it is a reconsideration of the dogma of Marxist "Class Warfare" which was created by the jews to make people fight as to not solve social problems.

Caste-less society is a very bad thing, unnatural, and on a racial state, this is equal to saying that one would abolish the natural order of ranking between peoples. This creates social anarchy, disharmony, and death for a civilization. Casteless society is denial of the natural order of rank, lying about it, creating hatred, and forced equalizing of all elements rather than co-operation for the betterment of the whole. This is the recipe of communism, where the jews instill complexes on people who on the lower castes are dependent on the higher (this goes both ways) and stir one part of a people against another, to cause cataclysmic social collapse.
The same thing is done on a racial basis in the United states, where the jews are enforcing a paradigm of race warfare and oppression, and then also forced equalization, which reinforces the above. This destroys civilization.
National Socialism applied on the Caste system in India would be this: The lowest castes should not attack the higher, but also the higher castes have to look for the betterment of the whole, and not only after themselves for a common rising of a society.
Also, people, families or individuals who rise higher, if that is within racial context, should be able to rise higher in that society, and enter another caste, not only based on financial wealth, but merits, and what they have given to a community. Likewise, people of a higher caste that are total parasites (such as jews in India who provide nothing but have hijacked Brahmins and higher religious strata), could de-evolve into a lower caste, and lose their status, insofar they do not do absolutely nothing to help the process of civilization to advance.
Within the context of India this becomes harder, as the Caste System is a Racial System as well, but if it were one uniform people, the above would be theoretical how it should be.

-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666
 
So I was contemplating... And formulated a hypothesis that castes in India were made on the basis of the spiritual evolution/progress of a community/group of people that were almost equally less or more advanced spiritually. To prevent them from mixing with upper higher castes that were spiritually advanced.
Shudras, vashas, were one of many lower classes that were allowed to eat meat. Also the caste of warriors aka Kshatriyas below than Brahmins (priests) also indugled in eating meat.. Only the priests(Brahmins) were vegetarians. Priests were vegetarians because they were the only most highly evolved ones in Hindu society and so they didn't require meat to kept their bodies function properly?
The untouchability concept was practiced. Lower caste people weren't allowed to be touched or to touch the belongings of or the people of higher castes. Maybe due to some Spiritual obvious reasons. These all things which are considered EVIL today might have kept the society in ORDER before. It was only maybe after golden age that these things/laws were practiced wrongly and misunderstood because of the spiritual degeneration. No? Also the law for a widow woman in hindi society was to disallow her to remarry with another man. This thing has also been practiced wrongly and misunderstood. 

HAIL SATAN ❤️
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 1:16 PM, sahasrara bliss<sahasrarabliss@... wrote:
In North India, there are several castes that are spiritually devolved. I can safely assume that just by looking at these caste people, they are physically weak, most of them, are immoral and so stupid, they are dark browned skinned. The vibes they give is a feeling of dryness and kind of disgust.
There r several categories of caste to which government gives special privileges to these lower castes and doesn't give the same to upper class. So where is the equality now? When the world whines about equality, even in India, they become hypocrites when it comes to this topic. Why.. because if equal rights would be given to every caste upper and lower caste, it would destroy lower caste special privileges and they can't survive without it. They are weak and parasites.
To name one, there is a caste called "chamaar or chura" I'm not sure if a person in India gets jailed for calling a chamaar a chamaar because oh it hurts their sentiments. 
So there is a religion,  sikhism whose last leader destroyed caste system in a region and told every follower of the religion to add "Singh & Kaur name as their last/middle name before surname"
So, does NS government also aims to destroy caste system along with class system? No I think? It's important to separate people on caste based to keep ones bloodline pure. No?
 
Castism is different concept,later It is all about Branashram not untouchability.Bidur was Shudra by birth but he had got prime minister's crown in Mahabharata, Ravana was a Brahmin but got killed By Kshatriya Rama ( a follower of Shiva / Lucifer).

Pro Islamic communist historians always exaggerated Indian history to defame India's soul,that's all.
 
I'm talking about it differently. A superior spiritually advanced being wouldn't eat food that's cooked by a person who is on a very low spiritual level. That's one thing that falls in untouchablility. Isn't that sensible? And ravana, ram, etc mahabharata are not literal characters and these ramayana and mahabharata epics are fictional containing hidden spiritual msgs or knowledge about past. 
HAIL SATAN ❤️
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 4:14 PM, cameobose666@... [JoyofSatan666]<[email protected] wrote:   Castism is different concept,later It is all about Branashram not untouchability.Bidur was Shudra by birth but he had got prime minister's crown in Mahabharata, Ravana was a Brahmin but got killed By Kshatriya Rama ( a follower of Shiva / Lucifer).

Pro Islamic communist historians always exaggerated Indian history to defame India's soul,that's all.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top