of the true light said:
First I have to make it clear that we are talking about two different things at this point.
I am talking about health and fitness, and you are talking about losing weight (and fat?), as fast as possibly specifically.
That being said, when you talk about losing fat and weight with your current method and considering this huge success denying other methods, it makes sense. You changed the setting so that the main fuel source for your body is now fat, of which you have plenty available. With that premise, yes, huge success, I do agree.
What I do not agree is that you deny that exercising is as important as other aspects for health, which are: Nutrition, exercising and recovery. All of these three together are equally important.
When I mentioned exercising being half or one third of the solution, I said it from the perspectice of being healthy and fit. Losing fat adn weight as fast as possible is a method to increase health when one has been overweight. It is not health per se.
I already listed multiple positives about exercising on another thread, and I should add that fit people can handle more bioelectricity. One key component for us Spiritual Satanists.
Disregarding exercising because it does not help you in fat loss to the extent you are now losing is not productive to your long term mental and physical health. Exercising can be almost any kind, and every method has its own skillset which keeps the mind active and sharpened in its own way on top of the physical benefits.
And to your specific situation about exercising I would also like to mention that 6 weeks is an awful short period of measure. That is one and half months. Many meaningful changes in physique take many months minimum, and long term gains are made in years. Endurance athletes grow over a decade minimum, for example.
Further, when you mention concrete numbers, in this case exercising being responsible for 1-2% of fat loss,
that is highly situational. Issuing a blanket statement without any regard to circumstances is not a very good idea as it does not mean it would be true to anyone else other than in the situation when it was tested. That being said, do you have a research paper on that? I am interested about it outside of this discussion. Also, the numbers you mentioned regarding exercising seem very dubious to me because those who practice physical exercising have increased their metabolic rate. In other words, they consume more calories just by being idle compared to one who does not exercise.
Lastly, I would not use terms such as “proper human diet” when you have only begun your learning about the subject. Some more key things to take into account: Different body types response differenttly to different things, everyone needs a balanced nutrition regardless of their composition, exercising and all of its implications on health, both physical and mental and the list goes.
So I kindly ask you to stop parroting what a man says on a video and start questioning
all the things you learn.
Including the things that you initially agree upon. The best way to learn is to compose material from as many resources as possible, not just one or two. Furthermore, practical application on yourself and seeing what others do in the practical sense will fulfill the picture even more.
To your question, what is varied diet. Basically having a multitude of sources for carbohydrates, fats and protein. As there are multiple different forms of fats, so are there protein and carbohydrates and not each of these function in the same manner.
I got the picture that you are into meat & egg eating mainly because that is what you seemed to promote, not taking into account that for a human to prosper that is not the way to go. Same goes with the statement of eating sardines for 15 years. Please, use critical thinking. Having multitude of minerals in one food item does not mean one should only eat one thing forever or “15 years”, even when someone says it technically can be done due to the food item being rich in minerals.