Without Shiva there is no Brahma, this is an inner correlation not about the being but about beings involved. This is why in most cases Brahma is seen as a child or spawn of Shiva, not the other way around. Because the Atman is a principle of creation, idle and unattainable by itself.
If there is no Shiva, which relates to meditation and the function of the mind, "Brahma" as a state of consciousness is unattainable. Vishnu is required as Vishnu is the state of function between the two. This is why Shiva active, Brahma is more as a concept of the personified Atmic level of consciousness. Without Vishnu there is also no Brahma and no Shiva, as Vishnu corresponds to Jusice and Unity of the two concepts represented by Shiva and Brahma.
Gross representation and shoving in spiritual allegories and trying to grossly literalize them leads nowhere.
If there is no Shiva, which relates to meditation and the function of the mind, "Brahma" as a state of consciousness is unattainable. Vishnu is required as Vishnu is the state of function between the two. This is why Shiva active, Brahma is more as a concept of the personified Atmic level of consciousness. Without Vishnu there is also no Brahma and no Shiva, as Vishnu corresponds to Jusice and Unity of the two concepts represented by Shiva and Brahma.
Gross representation and shoving in spiritual allegories and trying to grossly literalize them leads nowhere.
indrasoma said:HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:indrasoma said:So there does exist a higher universal soul beyond individual souls? I thought I read earlier in one of your posts that ether was just a mindless energy with no intelligence. What is the relation between this world soul and Satan? Was it created by Satan for this universe, or is it even higher than Satan, with Satan being one of its creations?
Soul is an interchangeable term for the same type of fine energy that constitutes the soul, based on the Aether. This is a concept, and it just deals with potentiality of creation, of which there is infinite. Soul is also commonly used to show consciousness, which is how I use it here. Yes, there is a mass consciousness at the universe, that permutes everything, but it's not a specific entity. It's as if saying, yet another particle. The Aether is a common name for this and easier to understand. The Atman is another name. Satan is to this what Brahma is to Atman.
It does not have a mind as we presently recognize and understand mind, such as through our own. It takes meaning from within it's own creations, and it's therefore, not "Independent".
What rests above us is nature, and we are it's creatures. Satan is also created from nature, as everything else is and will ever be. The more beings advance in the ladder of creation, the more they embody the nature or universe by itself, as a vessel that draws in an empty vacuum, and expresses it with meaning.
This is why Satan is referred to as the Most High or "The Creator of the Universe". This is because the idle force of the universe requires a force for expression, and Satan has been known in many different cultures by endless different names to embody this at an inconceivably high level.
Thank you, that makes sense. But why does Satan correspond to Shiva then instead of directly corresponding to Brahma? If Satan were Brahma, then we would be on the side of Brahma versus the side of the "A-Brahamic" programs (or "not-Brahma" / "without-Brahma") since according to what I've heard, the "a" in Sanskrit is a negation.
And to the people who have trouble relaxing without weed, I would recommend reading more about how to improve thyroid function. Cellular energy is necessary for relaxation, and thyroid is what produces cellular energy. There are many, many anti-thyroid substances in the world, which is why poor thyroid function is so epidemic.