I want to try and put as much into this post so as to let others - if any - reply and have their say, hopefully with me not replying back, and to try and get it over and done with. I'm being honest and direct - take that as an attack, or take it as me saying
my things
my way. Be diplomatic, or don't be. For betterment - don't presume. Ask questions and seek clarity, instead. I've been called autistic because I have taken things too literally; what's the opposite for those who try to read between the lines and fill in the blanks, choosing what the other person is saying which they didn't say, as if they - those who do this - are an authourity, being high and mighty and know-it-alls? This, the opposite thing, is what has been happening here a lot. Maybe I am entirely wrong with this; maybe I am entirely right with this; maybe I am somewhere in the middle with this.
This is going very-much off-topic (then again, I started the thread, so...), but because things have been said, I think they need to be addressed.
What makes a "normal" Spiritual Satanist? That you have to do this, do that and do it like this in that time? To me that sounds like cliqué-y, cult-like, religious. I've been saying that since before I knew about "an enemy place", which I don't think I ever mentioned, just merely referring to it indirectly and without name. I can't copy off others. I do things my way. "We are all individuals", "what works for one might not work for another", "we need to practice and learn what works the best for us as individuals" - so a "normal" Spiritual Satanist?
Regarding me being banned - (rhetorical question) why was I added to the email thread and suggested by a higher-up? (I didn't say "No! F Off! I don't want to be a part of it!", yet they still added me; rather, I explained things and decided (even though I didn't say is explicitly) that it wouldn't be a good idea; i.e. I made excuses, before I was added to the thread.) If I'm a troll and should be banned, then why would a higher-up recommend me? I speak honestly - granted, I could be more diplomatic (I am considering doing a Mercury Square), but so could most people here, but why would I be suggested by a higher-up if I should be banned? I can remember being asked before what have I done here, and apparently we judge people by their actions, so... should I be banned? What's a "normal" Spiritual Satanist?
Recently to a poster, I said "you're saying..." - I could and should have said it more like "It sounds like you're saying...". I think most people realise this about themselves - in my head to me it is fine what I am saying. I think a lot of people agree, for themselves. A big problem is that tonation is not heard, voice is not heard, emotion is not heard/felt, body language is not seen, countenance is not seen... It's only words and that is not enough, even with emoticons. In hindsight, what I said to the newb seemed more abrupt and abrasive, and I could have done better.
Regarding my constitution, experiences, the Elements which make-up my Soul and their amounts, etc. - there are many people with many different configurations. If I should be banned, then so should 99% of the Planet - which equals much more than 1 billion people being reached in 10 years. The only thing that should be a part of the cancel culture is the jew, no?
Soaring Eagle 666 [JG said:
" post_id=422927 time=1675845534 user_id=346]it was written so nonsensically that people might think the opposite
It's rather difficult mentioning something without mentioning something, advertising somewhere else. I was more subtle and indirect about it. That makes it nonsensical. If I mentioned it directly and linked to it, then that would have been breaking the rules. I chose to not be specific while still referring to it.
that you believe HP Cobra actually did waste time there
I never once said that I believed that. Did I not say things like "supposedly"? That does not mean "I think this is true". I also did say that someone else was pretending to be HPHC and apologising, and admitted so. If you are going to say anything about what I said, then say it correctly. I got sick and tired of christians trying to be authourity on everything about me, telling me who I am, what I am, what I mean, etc., and I get sick and tired of it when debating christians to this day, as well. On here, it's not just me; others on here have had the same happen with them, as well. Don't presume to tell me what I am saying, etc.; instead, ask questions and seek clarity - unless you
want drama to ensue. Wise, intelligent people ask questions; retards shout their mouths off ignorantly. We can all be keyboard warriors. We need to be diplomats, instead (as cheesy as that might sound). I left that anti-life institution. I don't need the same shit here. This is not me being disrespectful to a JG; this is me being honest and direct, and correcting things that were said. I am also saying it to everyone, not just the one I am replying to.
Hilarious - this post was made recently, and while I was typing some of this (over a few days, before submitting this post), it was at the top of the threads - "Kali Yuga & AI: Be Prepared For Fake Recordings, Fake "Statements" etc - About JoS and Future [Updated 8 February]". Hilarious. If you're going to say anything about me, make sure it is not fake. If it is possible, the post of mine that was deleted should either be restored or a screenshot of it should be made and shared, to show what I said; however, me being the doubtful, sceptical, cynical, suspicious, disbelieving person I apparently am becoming more and more of, it might be altered to make me look worse - and it just won't be restored/screenshotted and shared in a post here anyway. I made a thread, "Rabbis Bring Jesus Home for Christmas". Now either 1) I made a mistake, that I thought I submitted the post but I didn't and I thought it was deleted, so I must have previewed it without submitting it, so I had to do it again, or 2) I did submit the post and it was deleted, so I made the post again. With that in mind, and the previous drama rubbish, it is still in my mind as to how I perceive things here, how they've been going. Currently, it's a long way to be proper, mature, civil, elite for 1 billion people in less-than 10 years.
It was not just "the enemy forum". That was not the only thing; there was another site where the so-called apology was mentioned. I was speaking (typing) generally and not trying to break any rules by what I was typing, about something having allegedly happened. It's not easy to mention something without being specific, and I wasn't specific and I didn't say anything about believing it; checking the other place, you'd see where I was doubting it... not believing it, yet my thread here was still deleted; what you said in yours was specific and won't be deleted. I am quite certain that I didn't break the rules. "The enemy forum", or whatever it is, is just nothing anyway.
By the way, in case anyone claims that I'm "still attention-seeking" - I could have replied sooner. I waited to reply - on purpose. I'm trying to show an air of calm, while being direct in my posts in this thread. Don't presume; instead, seek clarity and know.
13th_Wolf said:
Ideas are fuck all without work and sticking your neck on the line. It is all about your means, the timing and everyones initiative whos involved.
If you cared so much you could've devoted massive energy to materialising this at an earlier point. But you are naturally self interested more than willing to commit to that,
Well, as I understood it before, Spiritual Satanism is for the self; National Socialism is for the community and civilisation.
I am also to some degree and personally am wanting to change from this. This website and the good people here tower above me, and you.
I have said before that I am/have been one of the slowest to advance and improve and get better. Instead of being presumptuous like christians are, thinking they're authourities on everything, users here should ask questions and seek clarity and understanding and be diplomatic. "We all go at our own speed" - but apparently, that's not what "normal" Spiritual Satanists do. In hindsight - which I know everyone pretends to hate! - I definitely could have been moving quicker than what I have.
Ultimately it was Satan's intention for this and for it to have been done right not half stuck in dreamy idealism and then the jews can come and curse people through the cracks.
1) Maybe I was onto something a few years ago, then. A number of times (not many, I admit) I thought something, and someone else mentioned it/a sermon was made about it or including it, and I put that down to mere coincidence that I considered it already; and 2) -
Blitzkreig [JG said:
" post_id=422863 time=1675813671 user_id=21286]
Your idea was not stolen in the sense of it being purposely taken without consent. I take credit for the initial idea surrounding Ask Satan, and yes it started similar to your idea. Unfortunately I was not on JoS at the time and was not aware of what you had originally devised. Through rapid communication with other members, the final product was devised in a matter of days.
No offence, but that sounds more like someone on the forum's idea, rather than Satan wanting it to happen. On the other hand - as JoS advances, anything and everything that actually makes the World a better place can be put down to Satan wanting it to happen... yet I can remember a post by (I think) HPS Maxine or HPHC saying that Satan was surprised that we got this far (I am paraphrasing). Not every single individual bit and thing comes from divine injection into our Minds. Sometimes, Humans have good ideas and do things.
I agree with it being done like that, so anything else is irrelevant
Of course you agree with it being done this way. It is so religious. Everything the higher-ups do is perfect and always right (despite those posts/roles/titles not being held with impunity and tenure; i.e. they can be revoked).
Personally, I think it is good - and not just good, but also important - to scrutinise and play Devil's Advocate and attempt to hold things, claims, etc., to account. Yes, it is uncomfortable, but that's probably because people are not used to it. Naturally, not being an authourity on everything, I can just push it only so far, but it is extremely important. If me doing this - when I feel it necessary to do so - means I should be banned, then maybe I should share a small stipend every Sunday to appease those wielding the ban hammer - or those who might in the future. :roll: I also do say "the proof is in the pudding". A lot of people demand proof; if having a regular, long-time member (me) here who can sort of play that role on their behalf, while I also attempt to encourage them to try the things themselves, then I can't see a problem with doing that. Anyone - let me know why you have problems with it, and what those problems are.
One problem is those who don't like to be scrutinised, instead of accepting it as a vital part of the Scientific process - which includes direct and deliberate, or indirect and accidental/unintentional (in my case), peer-reviewing, as I have noticed regarding my own results in the past. Since these peer-reviews were entirely unexpected and unintentional, since those who had similar results to what I had did have similar results to what I had, that helps to solidify and confirm it. For those who are starting at a different place than I and those others, they might accept some internal scrutiny/criticism/questioning from time to time - even if it is unofficial/unsanctioned. As a former christian, I feel that I must, instead of just accepting things blindly. I know I have had results; others have had results similar to mine; and others have had yet other results. I say it's all a part of the process.
I genuinely cannot see a problem with that. I think it is very, very important.
![Blitzkreig [JG]](/data/avatars/m/21/21286.jpg?1704756304){kind=avatar}
. I don't think there is anything wrong with getting recognition.
